I am pretty sure the reason why they are not developping games on the PS3 is more than just because it's complicated...
They can't expect people to believe that in 2009.

It's really not that hard to believe for most with the exception of a few very vocal Sony "loyalist"

2007 - orange box
2008- left 4 dead
2009 - left 4 dead 2

doesnt look lazy to me.

2010. Left4 dead 3

2011. Yellow Box

I predict the future.

BTW.

How many games have Valve made for Playstation period?

What? I think you are avoiding the subject. I looked at your previous posts and it seems you have a problem with PS3 owners anyway. So you really think the reason why Vavle is not developping games for the PS3 is because it's «too complicated»...

Zero. Maybe a shitty counter strike game on the ps2...(the one with a single player story) but thats it.

In better words.
Valve is lazy, and doesn't want to try new things.
A game developer should never say something is "too complex"
Laziness.
/thread

I still want to think that EA might want to port it like they did with the Orange Box.

Still in any case, I'm not expecting Valve to do it.

How am I avoiding the subject? LOL Have you read my posts pertaining to the issue? Your conclusions is supported by what?

This company is basically saying the PS3 is not a viable platform for its products because of the complicated architecture and you are doubting that based on what? Sony even insists it intentionally made the PS3 architecture difficult. Are you a Valve employee?

What grounds do you have to discredit somethig being stated by Valve? Who are you again?

And I have no problem with PS3 owners. Maybe you should do more research.

Companies want to make a profit. For Valve, complicated = more expenses. Valve does not want to deal with it...get over it.

Naw I don't think they should never say it. I think they should never say it before they make an attempt.