Boutros said:
What? I think you are avoiding the subject. I looked at your previous posts and it seems you have a problem with PS3 owners anyway. So you really think the reason why Vavle is not developping games for the PS3 is because it's «too complicated»... |
How am I avoiding the subject? LOL Have you read my posts pertaining to the issue? Your conclusions is supported by what?
This company is basically saying the PS3 is not a viable platform for its products because of the complicated architecture and you are doubting that based on what? Sony even insists it intentionally made the PS3 architecture difficult. Are you a Valve employee?
What grounds do you have to discredit somethig being stated by Valve? Who are you again?
And I have no problem with PS3 owners. Maybe you should do more research.
Companies want to make a profit. For Valve, complicated = more expenses. Valve does not want to deal with it...get over it.
I'm not a fanboy, I just try to tip the balance in favor of logic and common sense.







