so they listed the good and bad of each conference and rate them at them at the end. microsoft got the highest score!!! http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/210636/e3-2009-the-best-and-worst-of-sony/

lol, where have you been, dude?

Xbox Man needed a replacement, glad you showed up :)

Good to have you back.

cool, i thought all were good. nintendo had the new metriod,mario and some news about zelda. sony showed off some good games, just nothing that grabbed my attention except for ff14 online, which i am getting on day 1 ( i loved ff11 online ). m$ had alan wake,natal,mgs :rising, a splinter cell which looked awesome. overall liked i said everyone had a good showing , i just thought m$ won because "natal" was just jaw dropping.

I agree with the scores.

This is what they gave everyone.

Sony: B+
Microsoft: A-
Nintendo: C+

thanks guys. i was banned. microsfot had a brilliant show. 2009 is year of 360.

Damn they were pretty harsh on Nintendo! Some of those 360 titles that they praised really weren't that great. They nailed Sony perfectly (despite me liking the new PS3 "gizmo").

They're logic is flawed simply based on how they perceive the motion controls shown between the three.

They are basing it on pure technology where MS>SN>NT. However, you must base it on actual purpose and design limitations and that is can it play my game and hopefully improve the experience. That is clearly NT>>SN>=MS simply since you can't do a lot of genres with either SN or MS products.

I would put my next paycheck on the fact that MS and SN will have another part for their systems that is somehow similar to a nunchuk in order for it to be feasible on core game types.

There scores were good, but for me I would reverse the Sony/Microsoft scores.