@monlosez

I was joking

Because AMD sucks? 

I believe there´s a window about PC Gaming.

Casual game is HUGE in PC, HD gamming is not great as expected, but I thint when you point the finger to INTEL, you are almost right, but I don´t see GPU performance as the main factor.. I see as the main factor STANDARDS that makes a HD game possible, hardware standards and specifications are too diverse and many people doing mainboards and 3D cards (middle end). So isn´t safe build games for PC´s as is for consoles when you track support and stability.

INTEL did thi "FIX" on the market to get time and stay on top... but I think PC needs better standards and less piracy... as you just sell 15% of you actual "playing base" (ohh god, I invented this 15% number, ehhehe).

read about amd fusion concept.... intel Larrabee aint original at all... both companys are working on this for some time but amd has and advantage because their IGPs are much better than intel's IGPs...

Honestly who cares? ITS INTERNAL, It will NEVER compare to a seperate card. 

ahh yes. I do believe that Intel has intentionally positioned the market to keep the X86 design important. Though the design is limited in capability and design. It is unfortunate that we are being held back in good CPU because of this.

Death of PC gaming. no

Yes, Intel are very competitive and always use extremely tuff business tactics.

Intel is really conquering the whole computing hardware market, pushing the two classic GPU makers ATI and Nvidia into a small 'high end enthusiast' niche, while themselves expanding the mass market, by first hijacking them with their weak integrated graphics, with the plan to have the consumers soon purchase expensive but useless iCore 7s and Laughabee systems every second year.

They're pure winners. I hate them.

Yep, you can tell its an almost monopoly when...

Corei7 which costs less than $100 to make, costs you over $500. :-o

I mean, I don't think Intel is immoral or unmoral, or any worse or filthier than other companies (or at least I don't have proof of that), I just think it's sad that one company became so big and strong while AMD just can't compete.

I wish someone strong like MS could help AMD somehow (without it being illegal or anything).

The best way for them to help AMD is to upgrade the Xbox 360 GPU and give AMD a one off payment for the I.P.

Actually its funny really, the two times ATI pwned Nvidia hard for examples were the R300 and Rv770, however in the first case Microsoft pwned Nvidia hard for screwing them around with the Xbox 1 by with-holding Dx9.0 specifications. In the 2nd, Nvidia was arrogant and focused on GPGPU rather than graphics.

I had a 'woundn't it be cool' moment before when I imagined the Xbox 360 upgraded with a direct x 11 GPU and another core was added to the CPU to make it faster, render all games at 1920/1080 with a perfectly smooth frame-rate.