Perfect! I want this gen to last as long as possible!
Perfect! I want this gen to last as long as possible!
heruamon said:
The only thing about that is I don't believe would seek to alienate current xbox 360 users, so they would have to ensure that developers make the games scalible to different console models. I think we will see the same think with M$ using SD cards as well, since that gets around the DVD limitations of space, and also the transfer speeds associated with running games off brd. |
A hard transition between generations would alienate consumers more than a model update and a moving target of specifications. Especially if they use digital distribution which they are rolling out now. Wouldn't a smarter model for moving beyond the Xbox 360 be to use two smaller hardware jumps than one large jump and keep compatibility for as long as possible with the older SKUs? The best way to get around the limitations of DVD transfer rates would be a HDD install, if every game downloaded was designed with the 70MB/s transer speed (16* BR equivelent) then they could drastically increase performance.
@SSJ
I would say it'd go without saying that they would mandate the developers design their games with both specifications in mind.
Tease.
Squilliam said:
A hard transition between generations would alienate consumers more than a model update and a moving target of specifications. Especially if they use digital distribution which they are rolling out now. Wouldn't a smarter model for moving beyond the Xbox 360 be to use two smaller hardware jumps than one large jump and keep compatibility for as long as possible with the older SKUs? The best way to get around the limitations of DVD transfer rates would be a HDD install, if every game downloaded was designed with the 70MB/s transer speed (16* BR equivelent) then they could drastically increase performance. @SSJ I would say it'd go without saying that they would mandate the developers design their games with both specifications in mind. |
Well...the history of consoles certianly support your points...Nintendo lost it's crown to Sony with PS and PS2, and Wii and 360 completely hammered PS3 cornation in a major way, due to the gyations of generational consoles. I'd say M$ has to be very careful to not alieanate users with older hardware, if they trek upon this strategy. What you're talking about would deliver full B/C, and that would be a huge plus, and it would certianly be ALOT easier for M$ to really reap some profits from the development of the 360...
i could see new 360 more as out of the box console with
build in wifi,
Natal inside the standard console package,
MS 360 Remote,
45nm gpu and cpu,
better dvd,
but i wouldn't call it new system - it would be more like a slim version mixed with the same thing sony did with introducing ps3 40gb version and stopping 60gb version, but backwards. though i think they would keep arcade as it is now(or would start adding 20gb hdd) and made premium and elite consoles as those slim 360s i mentioned.
| SaviorX said: ..........Yea, I doubt that. The next gen will start 2012 the latest. |
No way... 2013 at the earliest. We may see a Wii HD by 2012, but that will be a transition console and not a new console.
Kinda funny coming from the company that mocked Sony 10 years plan..
So Pachter wasn't that crazy, after all, when he said that there wouldn't be a generational leap from PS3 and 360 for a long time? :)
| Ail said: Kinda funny coming from the company that mocked Sony 10 years plan.. |
How did M$ mock sony's 10-year plan?
Slim with no hard drive and Natal would print money
Repent or be destroyed