By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Could the True Blue Megaton be GTA5, PS3 exclusive?

yo_john117 on 28 May 2009
Max King of the Wild said:
yo_john117 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Okay I'll correct you. You're wrong

So TAke 2 just decided to take one for the team, and they signed a contract for absolutly free?

Come on man, thats so unrealistic.  Contracts cost money...everybody knows that.

So how i'm i wrong?

not necessarily

Show me a videogame contract that was free?? 



Around the Network
Max King of the Wild on 28 May 2009
Dark Chaos said:
Max King of the Wild said:
^ no you are

Nice response. I didnt expect anything else from you.


sorry i have no patience with illiterats

S.T.A.G.E. on 28 May 2009
Xen said:
The gamer in me says "oh please god no, not this failure of an attempt at an enjoyable game"

The Sony fan in me hopes that it is... GTA is one of the few titles that double as both a system seller and a casual, well known game... a key to advancing in western markets, no doubt.


Remember when Sony monopolized all of the third parties? Man...those were the days.



Max King of the Wild on 28 May 2009
yo_john117 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
yo_john117 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Okay I'll correct you. You're wrong

So TAke 2 just decided to take one for the team, and they signed a contract for absolutly free?

Come on man, thats so unrealistic.  Contracts cost money...everybody knows that.

So how i'm i wrong?

not necessarily

Show me a videogame contract that was free?? 


only after you show me a video game contract

Megadude on 28 May 2009
Dark Chaos said:
Megadude said:
Killergran said:
Max King of the Wild said:
^ unless it was contracted

The only reason there would be such a contract is if Take2 decided it was worth more than the potential revenue they are forgoing.

And you are being silly.

I'm talking about a contract which thoeretically should have been in place before this gen even started. If no such contract ever existed then Sony was very stupid not to have made one.

Sony have made alot of stupid mistake and this was another one. Lets move on

Stop trolling on my thread and go play ninja blade or somthing. I'm trying to have a reasonable conversation with owners of all consoles and you're disturbing the peace.

 



Around the Network
Killergran on 28 May 2009
Megadude said:

I'm talking about a contract which thoeretically should have been in place before this gen even started. If no such contract ever existed then Sony was very stupid not to have made one.

The existance of such a contract would defy all common sense. Since GTA IV is multiplatform.

And if there was such a contract, Take 2 would be willing to pay 175 million dollars to rip it up.



This is invisible text!

Dark Chaos on 28 May 2009
Megadude said:
Dark Chaos said:
Megadude said:
Killergran said:
Max King of the Wild said:
^ unless it was contracted

The only reason there would be such a contract is if Take2 decided it was worth more than the potential revenue they are forgoing.

And you are being silly.

I'm talking about a contract which thoeretically should have been in place before this gen even started. If no such contract ever existed then Sony was very stupid not to have made one.

Sony have made alot of stupid mistake and this was another one. Lets move on

Stop trolling on my thread and go play ninja blade or somthing. I'm trying to have a reasonable conversation with owners of all consoles and you're disturbing the peace.

 

How am I trollin Megadude? And go and start a lemonade stand to help cover the losses from the PS3 :)



Megadude on 28 May 2009
Dark Chaos said:
Megadude said:
Dark Chaos said:
Megadude said:
Killergran said:
Max King of the Wild said:
^ unless it was contracted

The only reason there would be such a contract is if Take2 decided it was worth more than the potential revenue they are forgoing.

And you are being silly.

I'm talking about a contract which thoeretically should have been in place before this gen even started. If no such contract ever existed then Sony was very stupid not to have made one.

Sony have made alot of stupid mistake and this was another one. Lets move on

Stop trolling on my thread and go play ninja blade or somthing. I'm trying to have a reasonable conversation with owners of all consoles and you're disturbing the peace.

 

How am I trollin Megadude? And go and start a lemonade stand to help cover the losses from the PS3 :)

I would need to sell 10 billion glasses of lemonade at $1 each to cover losses from the Box. Go to law school so you can help MS the next time they get Sued.

 

Be gone troll!



Dark Chaos on 28 May 2009
Megadude said:
Dark Chaos said:
Megadude said:
Dark Chaos said:
Megadude said:
Killergran said:
Max King of the Wild said:
^ unless it was contracted

The only reason there would be such a contract is if Take2 decided it was worth more than the potential revenue they are forgoing.

And you are being silly.

I'm talking about a contract which thoeretically should have been in place before this gen even started. If no such contract ever existed then Sony was very stupid not to have made one.

Sony have made alot of stupid mistake and this was another one. Lets move on

Stop trolling on my thread and go play ninja blade or somthing. I'm trying to have a reasonable conversation with owners of all consoles and you're disturbing the peace.

 

How am I trollin Megadude? And go and start a lemonade stand to help cover the losses from the PS3 :)

I would need to sell 10 billion glasses of lemonade at $1 each to cover losses from the Box. Go to law school so you can help MS the next time they get Sued.

 

Be gone troll!

How am I trolling?



Dark Chaos on 28 May 2009

Why is anyone responding to this 12 year old's fantasy dream? Judging by his previous posts hes made crazier theories about SONY to fantasize about. Hes just trying to dream. Let him and move on