Yeah, you expected an 90+. I expected an 80-85.

I'd go further an say that all game reviews should be rated out of five stars. All this precision is a load of crap. The text of the review should be the most important thing.

I hype about this game, but i didn't care much about reviewer's scores.

Only thing that can judge this game good or bad is myself, reviewers're only guide line for me to read about this game.(Like bugs ,control schemes ,online multiplayers etc.)Not something that'll effect my decision to buy a game.(It may effected me 6-7 years ago, but not now.)

I enjoyed WaW which was reviewed at ~80 by most reviewers, so I think I'll be fine with that too

That's my point exactly , I dont think this game will be even worth that much when all is said and done. But everyone is entitled to their opinions eh?

Lol... this looks like a conversation between two deaf guys:

- Are you going to fish?

- No, I'm going to fish!

- Ohh ok... I though you were going to fish!

Hahaha, quite accurate!

If your point is that we're arguing against each other while making the same point then I suggest you read again.

I expected most reviews to be between 8.5 - 9.0, meta score 85. This confirms my expectations. Nice.

I still expect the game average score will be under 80 :).