@ all the people saying this is sony defense, why don't you take a look at the site before you start sspouting arrogant tripe.
Or maybe just leave and make this site a better place.
(not you garnett you can stay. you just made a mistake)
either way,
trusting a source like "People" magazine (which I have seen in the past)
newspapers, and tv shows is beyond understandable.
What's next? High School newspapers?
@zexen_lowe, just look at recent games on MC and go to the worst reviews, Teletext Game Central is always low.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
o_O
Ow!!
i expected some low scores but not this low.
Stone them to death with PS3's. Kill the unbelievers.
In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.
| theprof00 said: either way, trusting a source like "People" magazine (which I have seen in the past) newspapers, and tv shows is beyond understandable. What's next? High School newspapers? |
So the fact that their data comes to us through electromagnetic waves rather than through arrangements of ink or through a series of tubes, means that they are unreliable?
It's actually a teletext based games service and a rather good one at that. Unlike the popular pr... sorry, review sites such as ign and gamespot with reviews ranging from 7 to 10 they actually use the 1 to 10 scale with 5 being average(blasphemy, I know).
^^ no, having nothing to do with the industry in general does. Even Cosmopolitan shares opinion on some games; should it be accounted for?
My themeforest portfolio:
Assuming that was directed at me...
In what way does a 'teletext based games service' have nothing to do with the games industry?
EDIT: Sorry, I ignored half your post.
I believe that any review source should be counted towards metacritic, assuming they meet a few simple criteria
* Produce a certain number of reviews per year
* Have a readership of over a certain figure
* Judge games based on the games themselves, not based on anything like the console they are on.
I don't know if cosmo meets the first criteria, but I'm sure it meets the other two. Maybe if metacritic accepted a broader range of sources we wouldn't have artificially high GTA reviews, nor artifically low Wii Music reviews
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
