wow. one review on the site and its ACCEPTED?
fvck metacritic anyways though.... and reviewers too.
[IMG]http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii308/DerkDigg/spidey.png[/IMG]
guys if you read the rest of the thread you will see there are more
not a big deal. The opinions of many owners and their feedback on forums are more important for me, not just some review w/c are also... opinions.
Just another meaningless opinion of some random site know ones ever heard of.
The conclusion? who gives a damn.
sounds like payed site just to screw scores >_o
inb4 metacritic is dead to me....oh never mind.
or their 50 could be a real "average," review sites in general these days rate too high, I've seen way to many games getting something like 2 to 4.?/10 when they should be flat out 0s. inFamous doesn't have the perfect game play system imo, it's a cool game none the less though.
| dahuman said: or their 50 could be a real "average," review sites in general these days rate too high, I've seen way to many games getting something like 2 to 4.?/10 when they should be flat out 0s. inFamous doesn't have the perfect game play system imo, it's a cool game none the less though. |
I wish average was a 50 in school...i'd have a better GPA.
Obviously metacritic is biased. That shouldn't be a problem though as long as you get your sources from everywhere.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
