By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The myth of the more powerful console.

MikeB said:
Garnett said:
360 games could have way better graphics but they dont want to take 4 years to make a game (unless you look at alan wake but then again its a PC version so it could be 8 years)

Too human took nearly a decade.

Orly?

 

I honestly want you to TRY and explain that.



Around the Network
kowenicki said:
@cgi

No. you are being wayyyy too diplomatic there...

The strong implication from MikeB (as you know) was that it had been in development for the 360 for a decade... it wasnt.

I was more referring to the original post as food for thought: "When a team takes a long time to assemble a game, you can expect good results. "



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

you also have to consider "when a team takes a long time to assemble a game ON ONE PIECE OF HARDWARE, you can expect good results". what sense would it make to quote their development time on the PS1 when we're talking about their tech on the 360?



CGI-Quality you and MikeB both know he ment it was in development for the Xbox 360 for 10 years...(When the Xbox came out in 2005)

Both of you =Epic fail.



i was rather happy that the fanboys weren't spewing their nonsense in the thread on page 1. now it's become quite sad..



Around the Network

How did i miss this!

Awesome read... and 100% agree with you.



                            

thanks carl :P hope more people read it



Where did you get the information from?



er.. logic?



B..b.. but. But isn't KILLZONE 2 the king of graphics???

:(