By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Obama Proposes Tougher Fuel Economy Rules

Notably, this doesn't have to go through Congress to become "law" as it is something adminstered by an executive agency as previously authorized by Congress.  The Department of Transportation and the EPA have authority in this regard.

Hurdles remain despite fuel economy rules

As President Obama announces tough new fuel economy rules, experts wonder if consumers will buy new efficient vehicles.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/19/autos/fuel_economy_challenges/index.htm

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- New fuel economy rules announced by President Obama Tuesday have already gained support from major automakers, but the challenge will be getting consumers to play along, especially if gas prices remain relatively low.

The proposed new fuel economy plan will require passenger cars and light trucks to get an overall average of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016. By that year, cars will be expected to average about 39 mpg and trucks would be required to get 30 mpg. Current fuel economy standards are 27.5 mpg for cars and 23.1 mpg for trucks.

The plan accelerates by four years new fuel economy standards passed by Congress at the end of 2007. Fuel economy will be increased gradually beginning in 2012 and continuing through 2016.

Trying to create a fair system. Not all automakers will be treated as equals in order to avoid unfairly penalizing some automakers more than others. Depending upon the types of vehicles they produce, the plan sets different goals.

So-called "full line" automakers like General Motors and Toyota - companies that produce full-size trucks and SUVs in addition to small cars - would have lower fuel economy goals than carmakers like Honda and Mitsubishi which produce only smaller vehicles.

Under current fuel economy goals, automakers that beat their set fuel economy goals would be able to earn credits to spend against penalties they may earn in later years. Fuel economy targets will be ramped up gradually in the early years of the plan. That means that automakers are likely to work hard to hold on to credits during those years.

To earn those credits, automakers will take relatively easy steps right away to increase fuel economy as much possible, said Eric Fedewa, head of powertrain forecasting for industry consultants CSM Worldwide.

"What the new new CAFE rules will increase is the penetration of traditional, lower cost technologies," he said.

What kinds of vehicles will be coming? Expect to see more six-speed, seven-speed and even eight-speed transmissions and more use of smaller, turbocharged engines replacing bigger V-8 engines.

With technologies like these, automakers will be able to quickly raise fuel economy without having design whole new vehicles .These technologies will add to the cost of cars, though. The Obama administration estimates these rules will add about $600 to the cost of a car. That's on top of an estimated $700 added by changes to fuel economy rules that have already been recently enacted.

While automakers will try to improve the fuel economy of every type of vehicle, each manufacturer's fuel economy target will be an average of all the vehicles it sells. Manufacturers will try to sell some vehicles with very high fuel economy to offset sales of those that where fuel economy improvements are harder, Fedewa said.

Electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles will also have a big role to play, Fedewa said. An electric car like the Chevrolet Volt, expected in late 2010, or the Ford Focus electric car, expected soon after, can earn triple digit fuel economy ratings in federal tests, Fedewa said. A handful of electric car sales can offset a lot of SUV sales, so manufacturers should be willing to sell these high-tech cars at a loss just to earn mileage credits.

How it will hit consumers. In order to pay for this sort of strategy, automakers would have to raise prices of large vehicles, something that will penalize America's rural families said Randall Filer, a professor of economics at New York City's Hunter College who studies the auto industry.

"In effect what you do is penalize rural families and large families and use the increase in price those families to subsidize city dwellers and rich families that tend to use smaller cars," he said.

Higher truck prices are also going to keep families in their old vehicles longer.

"One thing we do know is, as long as you increase the severity of the standard and, particularly, as you increase the price of pick-ups and SUVs, that makes owners hold onto them longer," he said.

Keeping those old vehicles on the road will offset some of the gains that could be gained from drivers switching to newer trucks and SUVs.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Around the Network

So they're going to use the EPA?

I certainly hope not.

EPA ratings are GARBAGE, my 2008 car is (on average) 40-60% worse than the EPA ratings. I don't think there has ever been a car that is accurate to its EPA ratings, even their hybrid ratings are incorrect.

They need a better rating system, or to just eliminate the EPA ratings and find somebody else to do it.



Great. Car companies are struggling and more standards are being enacted. I really don't think this will help much. In fact - I think it will end up harming progress toward the future. I wish cars still got 10-11 mpg because I believe new transportation technology would have been a more pressing issue. If gas goes up to 4.00 dollars a gallon again but most small cars get close to 40mpg I think the outcry for electric would be less than if most cars got around 25mpg. The article lacks specifics but I really don't like the move. I think we are prolonging the inevitable.