Nice, real nice.
Played Hero first, but to lazy to do INFAMOUS, i'll do it later because just got a few unerrated games to play.

Nice, real nice.
Played Hero first, but to lazy to do INFAMOUS, i'll do it later because just got a few unerrated games to play.

insomniac17 said:
No, it's just a poorly written review, really. While I can respect that he doesn't like the game, he really could have at least talked more about the good aspects of the game. Heck, he could have talked more about everything. The review is way too short to really cover all aspects of the game, and he leaves a lot out. Elaboration is good, but there isn't much here. I can accept a low score, and I'm sure Kantor can too but I think we'd both like to see that the low score has a good review to back it up.
I've reformatted it so that it uses actual paragraphs, and added in some of my comments. A lot of them seem positive... The problem with his review is that it's just flat out short. He starts to explain things a bit, but then changes abruptly. In order for me to believe his opinion, he needs to explain a lot more since there are a lot of reviews out there that think this game is brilliant, and those reviews happen to explain a lot more. Another problem I have with this review, is that there are some wrong facts about the game, and judging from his comments, he either didn't spend much time with the game or just wasn't paying much attention. |
Well Metacritic accepted the review....
| NES said: Well Metacritic accepted the review.... |
Yes, but that's one reason why I dislike Metacritic; they include reviews that are very poorly written. To be fair, let me show you another review that is far better than this one, but is a lower score as well.
http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2009/05/25/review-infamous/
This one gave a 7/10
I found that both reviews that gave less than a 7 weren't great, but the one you posted was the worst of the two. In general, I tend to use Metacritic to find a wide variety of reviews to read; not for the average since any average joe can get a review on there (so it would seem) and have it count towards the average. So, I read reviews for content and that one in particular is severely lacking in it.
insomniac17 said:
Yes, but that's one reason why I dislike Metacritic; they include reviews that are very poorly written. To be fair, let me show you another review that is far better than this one, but is a lower score as well. http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2009/05/25/review-infamous/ This one gave a 7/10 I found that both reviews that gave less than a 7 weren't great, but the one you posted was the worst of the two. In general, I tend to use Metacritic to find a wide variety of reviews to read; not for the average since any average joe can get a review on there (so it would seem) and have it count towards the average. So, I read reviews for content and that one in particular is severely lacking in it. |
Gamesradar's review was good as well.
7/10
NES said:
Gamesradar's review was good as well. 7/10 |
I haven't read that one, but I wouldn't be surprised. My point is that I personally don't have a problem with lower scores (7 isn't bad in my book though), but I do have a problem with bad reviews. If that review had been a 10, and was written in the same manner, it would still be terrible. I remember reading a review for InFamous on a site somewhere that gave it a 10, and it was the most fanboyish, biased review I'd ever read. I'll try and find it again.
Just beat it today Amazing game it actually me quite long the ending was shocking!!!
*Al Bundy's My Hero*


*Al Bundy For President*
Waiting On GT7!!!
PSN ID: Acidfacekiller
insomniac17 said:
Yes, but that's one reason why I dislike Metacritic; they include reviews that are very poorly written. To be fair, let me show you another review that is far better than this one, but is a lower score as well. http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2009/05/25/review-infamous/ This one gave a 7/10 I found that both reviews that gave less than a 7 weren't great, but the one you posted was the worst of the two. In general, I tend to use Metacritic to find a wide variety of reviews to read; not for the average since any average joe can get a review on there (so it would seem) and have it count towards the average. So, I read reviews for content and that one in particular is severely lacking in it. |
That was a much better review, but if I had to assign a score to that, it wouldn't be a 7/10. They said the music was brilliant, it was a lot of fun to play, and the Karma was a great idea, but the graphics sucked, and there was nothing that really blew you away. That's more an 8 or 8.5 than a 7. What are these people, Edge?
finally beat the game.. i would go for the platinum im only about 5 trophies away from i think ill trade it in tho.. and rent it down the line and get the plat
THe oNLY TRue STuPiDiTY iS THe aCCePTaNCe oF iGNoRaNCe
PSNTAG K_I_N_G__COKE
The King Of The Iron Fist tournament
I was pretty dissapointed in this game. Average at best. Plays like a Spider-Man game with a more generic hero. The aiming system needs work, the powers are very limited and even then can't quite stick to the premise, and the graphics are rather bland and repetitive. It is fun at times, and others it suffers from the "mindless side mission" plague that all open worlds have, with random people calling out to you to tell you something you don't really have a reason to care about is happening, and you are to stop it ("there's a courier coming through this area!!") I think the 7 is dead on... maybe a 7.5.
Believing in the PLAYSTATION®3......IS.......S_A_C_R_I_L_E_G_E
i love this game, i have been playing it non stop but, those pics have antialiasin and the game is very jaggy, it does not have AA at all, i hope a patch comes out soon since is very glitchy too.
dd if = /dev/brain | tail -f | grep games | nc -lnvvp 80
Hey Listen!