By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Biologicaly who is superior men or women

Tyrannical on 15 May 2009
Undying said:
What defines better? Is there a score card or something?

 

 Useful inventions and innovations I would suppose, since thats why we consider ourselves an intelligent species.



Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
 — Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire

Around the Network
Undying on 15 May 2009
Tyrannical said:
Undying said:
What defines better? Is there a score card or something?

 

 Useful inventions and innovations I would suppose, since thats why we consider ourselves an intelligent species.

 

Thats not really fair, now is it. Women in most cultures were not allowed to do much of anything up until the turn of the 20th century.




Times Banned: 12

Press----------------> <----------------Press

Tyrannical on 15 May 2009
Undying said:
Tyrannical said:
Undying said:
What defines better? Is there a score card or something?

 

 Useful inventions and innovations I would suppose, since thats why we consider ourselves an intelligent species.

 

Thats not really fair, now is it. Women in most cultures were not allowed to do much of anything up until the turn of the 20th century.

 

 Women in most cultures didn't want to do much of anything before the 20th century.



Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
 — Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire

alekth on 15 May 2009

The original question is about biologically, not socially or academically superior though.

I'll second The Ghost of RubangB's notion about the hairiness though XD.

But women have periods, so that sucks for them.



monkeyman40210 on 15 May 2009

Men stronger, women can be smarter. But you need both to survive. So they equal. But i think that man is superior because man shaped the world as we know it, for better or worse.



Currently Playing: Mass Effect (360)

"Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed" - Gandhi

Around the Network
Tyrannical on 15 May 2009
alekth said:

The original question is about biologically, not socially or academically superior though.

I'll second The Ghost of RubangB's notion about the hairiness though XD.

But women have periods, so that sucks for them.

 

 OK then, woman have a more complete set of chromosomes then a man.



Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
 — Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire

highwaystar101 on 15 May 2009
Tyrannical said:
Undying said:
Tyrannical said:
Undying said:
What defines better? Is there a score card or something?

 

Useful inventions and innovations I would suppose, since thats why we consider ourselves an intelligent species.

 

Thats not really fair, now is it. Women in most cultures were not allowed to do much of anything up until the turn of the 20th century.

 

Women in most cultures didn't want to do much of anything before the 20th century.

You are so right in that statement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_suffrage

Guess they didn't want to do anything for centuries, but when the 20th hit, boy howdy did they want get involved for no apparent reason all of a sudden.



Moongoddess256 on 15 May 2009

In anthropology class we were taught the balance of power between men and women depends on who brings home the food (or in today's society, money)

There have in fact been matriarchal societies before. It depends a lot on geographical location. Men traditionally do the hunting and the women do the gathering - what the land naturally had to offer had a lot to do with how the society shaped.

Nowadays we are so far from hunter-gatherer societies things balance out - women don't have to spend nearly as much time out of their lifespans raising kids. Both men and women can earn livable wages - even if men still statistically on average make more.



[2:08:58 am] Moongoddess256: being asian makes you naturally good at ddr
[2:09:22 am] gnizmo: its a weird genetic thing
[2:09:30 am] gnizmo: goes back to hunting giant crabs in feudal Japan