I personal hate every single realistic racers and I have to say GT was the most fun I had with one. Forza didn't have that affect at all...
Former something....
I personal hate every single realistic racers and I have to say GT was the most fun I had with one. Forza didn't have that affect at all...
Former something....
Mummelmann said: Uhm, which people say this, OP? |
EdStation3 said:
Dgc1808 said:
Sephiroth357 said:
tombi123 said:
shanbcn said:
Because it is?
And in this thread there where people that said it was way better.
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=70791
plus just read this thread..alot of them are saying it is way ahead of forza.
yo_john117 said:
Well for starters these people.
And in this thread there where people that said it was way better. http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=70791 plus just read this thread..alot of them are saying it is way ahead of forza.
|
Because they're PlayStation fans except for maybe a few. 360 fans will say the opposite.
yo_john117 said:
Well for starters these people.
And in this thread there where people that said it was way better. http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=70791 plus just read this thread..alot of them are saying it is way ahead of forza.
|
which they were talking about sales of the upcoming games.
Next Gen
11/20/09 04:25 | makingmusic476 | Warning | Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.) |
More Cars
More options for tune-ups
More realistic driving
Better tracks
More events (I can't back this one up, but I think it does)
tarheel91 said:
I have raced before, actually. ;) And, as I said, the reason people say GT is superior is because it is, objectively, more realistic than Forza, and thus a better simulator. Whether that makes it a better game or not depends on what you want in a game. Why do we need to bring PC sims into this. They're in a whole other league entirely. They frequently involve investing money into a quality wheel/pedal system (no analog keyboards...), and those can cost several hundred dollars. It's not a fair comparison.
|
You obviously have never played forza if you think GT is way more realistic...they both handle the same. how can you tout reasims with GT when you just bounce off the walls in that game without reciecing any damage? Btw i know that Forza doesn't have amazingly realistic damage, but some damage is better than none.
Race pro is on the 360 so since your so tuned to realism play that
coolestguyever said about GT: More Cars OK, true More options for tune-ups WRONG More realistic driving WRONG Better tracks WRONG More events (I can't back this one up, but I think it does) I've never counted them. |
coolestguyever said: More Cars--400 cars or 600 cars..thats still a shitload of cars. More options for tune-ups--you have never played forza cause the amount of tuning you can do in that game is ridiculous More realistic driving--wrong...they both drive about the same. Better tracks--how can you have better tracks?? more maybe but you can't honestly say this... More events (I can't back this one up, but I think it does) you can bet your bottom dollar that they will most likely have the same amount of events. |
These differences are minute at best...
psrock said:
which they were talking about sales of the upcoming games. |
And it also had post where people said GT5 would be better than Forza 3....
I have a better question. How could anyone even suggest Forza is close to Gran Turismo?
I even have an answer. They don't own a PS3.
Lets put it this way, I much prefered the "demo" version of Gran Turismo to the full retail version of Forza 2. Each person has the right to his or her own opinion but honestly most of the people who've played both prefer GT. I mostly see people with only xbox's or people who are extremely xbox biased "prefer" Forza. Imagine that. Of course the sony fans prefer GT, but I've noticed most people in the middle prefer GT.