gameman said:
coolbeans said:
gameman said:
Carl2291 said:
gameman said:
Carl2291 said: If they try to directly take on the Wii... then they are stupid.
They need to keep focus on SONY and what they will do to take that 2nd place. |
Staying focused on Sony is the Worst thing they could do. Nintendo is selling 25 million -30 million a year and Sony is selling 10 million -11 million a year. Nintendo is going into super Nova and Sony is crashing and burning. The silly graphics war with Sony is only gonna cost Microsoft Millions. Making for shooters and hardcore games isnt gonna push hardware any more.
|
No, ignoring SONY is a BIG mistake... as a fight against Nintendo would be futile.
|
I think Microsoft is thinking that there gonna keep selling Halo and Fable games, but also put out a larger more direct war against Nintendo. Microsoft always always always attacks the biggest dogs. Almost never the second or third biggest. ex. Apple, Google, Playstation (till now), now its surely Nintendo. Microsoft makes $15 billion a year, why go after the third place dude?
|
Well I think what was meant to say in the beginning was not to "go after" the third place dude but focus on keeping him there and building a bigger lead.
|
The problem is that everyone already knows the end of the out come. Xbox 360 will have a 2:1 lead in the US, Sony will have a 3:1 lead in Japan, and Europe is gonna be tied. At the end its just a stalemate. Possible with Xbox 360 leading because of the lower price as the higher prices reach saturation.
|
No... everyone dosent know the outcome, thats the outcome YOU think will happen... and your basing it off of how the market is NOW.
The only one of your arguements that i can see being right is the America one... SONY will have Japan by at least 5:1, and Others will be in PS3 favour also by probably 1.5:1