NanakiXI said:
Falcon095 said:
NanakiXI said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:  |
1) Every home system uses rumble now even the last gen. Sony did their part with Immersion even if some other guy who backed out of the deal wants his share.
2) Once again everyone also uses analog sticks so is senseless. Sony was the first home system to make them vital to gaming though. MS did it better though I'll give them that.
3) All I can say was good job Sony on this one. Nintendo only had themselves to blame last two gens. The Nintendo has done a better job gaining back 3rd parties and Microsoft stole a lot from Sony but I congratulate them. That is how competition works.
4) Goldeneye was the shit on N64 and none (Bond games) has beat it since. So I give you this one lol.
5) Looking at Rare's success since Nintendo doesn't seem like much of a lose. Although I did enjoy Nuts and Bolts on the 360.
6) I'll beleive it when I see it. If and when it happens then this will truley be a stolen idea and I will completely agree with you.
Hasn't every company stole ideas of other companies at sometime. Not saying that iPhone was the creater of the touchscreen phone but since it's success for Apple everyone is copying touch screen phones now. Just an example and I'm not trying to go against you.
On the other hand I would've understood if the picture mentioned the whole Sony and Nintendo fiasco with the Playstation as stolen. Even then there is a thine line bending both ways on that situation.
|
Those claims are not of this generation, not even last generation (only the rare and the "we are back" ones)
1- Nintendo was the first one to use rumble in the controls with the N64, even if everyone does it doesn't mean it's not a "copy"
2- Once again Nintendo was the first one to use analog sticks with the N64, look at the pictures of the first generation of PS1 controllers and then look at the second generation, do you see something different? And no, Sony didn't make them vital, i remember playing most of my PS1 games without the analog stick (there was a option of use it but i didn't like them much ), on the other hand most (if not all) of Nintendo games needed the use of the analog stick (mainly because of the control form)
3- Yeah, i know that's how competition work but still just like how MS "stole" Sony exclusives, Sony did it in the PS days (i congratulate both, though.)
5- If i'm not wrong, that picture was crated when this gen was starting so Rare was still a great company back then.
Of course every company copies of others ideas, but lets say that when Sony joined the gaming division they weren't much of afraid being noticed as "copiers" because they did some obvious copying (like the analog stick) 
|
Ok you got me ther. I don't know why I completly forgot about the N64. Although to Sony's credit they were the first ones to make it built into their controller. If i remember corectly though I had a 1st party controller before the N64 that had analog so Maybe it is both Nintendo and Sony.
People do forget the original things Sony has done though, that is the only sad thing.
|
Well don't forget about it!!! lol j/k
Yeah, every single company do something original (or at least copy something and make it better
). The N64 was the first console to have analog sticks, when it launched Sony launched the second gen of PS1 controller which included it (i think those included rumble too, i don't know know this for sure, though) and i think that's the main reason of why it wasn't needed at all the analog stick in many PS1 games.
I agree with you that Sony has done many original things (or make those better, like the rumble), the problem of this is that many Sony fanboys repeat over and over how MS has done "Y" or "X" bad thing when Sony did it two generations ago (to say an example), that's when people start talking shit about Sony and when they forget the good things of them.