Perhaps maybe I'm misunderstanding a few things so correct me where I'm wrong.
But based on my understanding, MAG is more along the lines of Warhawk rather than Killzone 2.
So when I saw the trailers/stills of the game I was immediately impressed because in my head I was comparing it to Warhawk. I understand that in terms of ps3 games, Warhawk is on the verge of becoming a grampa so comparisons with anything new will be unfair.
But then again since MAG is closer to Warhawk than any other game (again correct me if I'm wrong) that's what we should use as a yard stick right?
From my understanding, (Again correct where wrong)
- MAG has no single player/main storyline like Warhawk/unlike KIllzone2
- MAG is meant to be a multiplayer experience with a stupid amount of people playing at once, meaning straight away; visually speaking Crysis should have nothing to worry about.
- MAG trailers so far are mainly early builds.
So with these points in mind...why are people expecting MAG>> Killzone2 visually?
I guess I'm looking at it from a different angle to everyone else so can someone please explain?












