By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Gran Turismo 5 > Halo 3 - Sales wise?

gt5 can only dream of reaching HALO 3 type numbers. HALO 3 is a cultural icon, especially in America.

There are other racers like FORZA 3 giving gt5 competition.

Don't fool yourself -
gt5 won't be that much better than forza 3..if at all.

Remember, FORZA 2 got a 90 on metacritic, whil gt prologue only got 82



Around the Network

Wheres my GT portable?



It's just that simple.

Zuzic said:
gergroy said:
Zuzic said:
atma998 said:
What? LOL

Come on guys if GT5 hits the 5 millions it would be a great feat this gen. We can't compare with sale figures of last gen because the userbase is completely different!

A good example is GTA franchise, previous generation saw sales of 17.79M (GTA:SA), 14.20M (GTA:VC) and 11.60M (GTAIII). Now GTAIV is only at 5.56M and is the PS3 best selling game.

GT5:P is not doing very well too, considering it is massively bundled in Japan and that the game is only at 3 millions (while the only GT game on the PS3 yet).

Install base has NOTHING to do with sales, except a limit. If you only had 10 million consoles sold obviously you wouldn't sell more then 10 million of the same game.

 

Install base means nothing otherwise. Games which do steller, seem to do the same no matter the install base.

MGS2 - 7 million Early game for PS2 during the 20-30 million install base.

MGS3 - 4.5 million(including subsistance) During the 100 million install base, also widely accepted as the "best" MGS.

MGS4 - 4 million to date, on a 14 million install base at the time.

 

GT3 sold 15 million, and it released with PS2 basically. A basically no install base system at the time.

All GTs sell relatively the same, GT3 moreso because of bundling.

 

Also your idea that GT5p is selling bad is shameful. It is a demo. In fact GT4p only sold 1.4 million, while GT5p sold 3 million, only 400 thousand of which were bundles. Compared to other demos in the GT franchise it is selling much more. In fact it's SELLING AS A DEMO. If you released a halo demo no one would pay 40$ for that.(Actually strike that, people would, but not nearly in the same fashion). Halo name is big as a FPS, halo wars proved that.

 

GTG5 will sell more then halo 3, it's rediculous to think otherwise.

 

dude, your post is full of all sorts of fail.  first of all, I'm really sick of people bringing up the metal gear series as an indicator of how user base affects sales.  MGS3 had almost no marketing push, where metal gear solid 2 and 4 were highly marketed and pushed.  MGS3 is also the worse reviewed game of the series, metacritic of 91, where MGS2 is 96 and MGS4 is 94.  So your idea of MGS3 being highly regarded as the best in the series is laughable. 

Another issue with that argument is MGS4 was bundled with hardware, which nobody ever seems to think about when making this comparison.  I also love how you give LTD numbers of the game sold, but refer to it selling that number on the install base at the time.  Have people not bought ps3's since the game came out and also picked up that game? 

GT3 was bundled with the ps2 worlwide for over a year.  What do you think that might have done to the sales numbers of that game? 

As far as userbase affecting sales, think of it this way.  When you release a movie, you release it on dvd and blu ray.  Now, not as many have people have blu ray players, so the sells of that movie won't be as high on the blu ray side as the dvd side.  Now, imagine if you didn't release that movie on dvd at all, only blu ray.  Would that movie sell as much as it could if it was released on both?  No, because not as many people have access to blu ray players.  The same concept applies to video games.  Yes, there will be one or two exceptions to every rule but the idea that install base has nothing to do with sales is moronic at best.

 

 

40% of a games LTD is sold within the first week. A factor which is still current today, only thing changing that is things like WII fit. (Bundles don't count of course). 95% are sold within the first 2 months. Review scores do not equal sales, and surveys and general acceptance is MGS3 was the best. Personally I like 4 better, but whatever. MGS3 was far better then 2, review scores change per game. If you release a game, and it scores 95, I am 100% sure if you release a game which is the same it'll score lower. But why? Even if it's better it'll score lower.... But why...? People get used to it. MGS2 was groundbreaking, then MGS3 comes along, it did everything better but didn't have the impact.

 

Majoras Mask is a clear example of it. It is better then OoT(Though both are beaten by link to a past) but majoras is seen to be less of an impact. But why? OoT was the first jump to 3d, majoras mask just seemed less because of that.

 

People say goldeneye 64 is the best FPS of all time. Yet if you give it to someone who never played it before and started playing FPS now, they would probably say it's bad. Is it bad? Yes and no. Things age, and get worse with age as other games do things better, and even games that do it better may not be seen to be better in conparison.

 

FF is a good ideal. FF7 and 10 sold around the same. They both released on a console with not a large install base. FF12 and 10 have the same metacritic review, yet 12 sold 3 million less, on a much larger install base.

 

Install base means nothing. 2 things are what gets sales. Advertising, and core genre audience. No advertising, piss poor sales, no matter the game. Core genre audience refers to the actual number of people who enjoy said genre in that console userbase, and normally stays the same number throughout, in fact in most cases decreases, not increases.(People adopting or dropping). If you have 40 million people who have the console, yet only say 5 million actually like the RPG genre, if you sell 1 million, people would see that as only 2.5% buying the game. Is that fair to say, or is it fair to say 20% of people who are into those games bought it. Both are wrong, however it's something to thing about. Not that only people in that core audience are going to buy that type of game, but majority, around 90% comes from them, others are from people who want to try something new.

 Your example of majora's mask is based on opinon

 

Ok, I have bolded the areas of your argument that are faulty.  First of all, games like halo and gran turismo don't adhere to this 40% first week rule.  Halo 3 will probably end up selling at least 11 to 12 million and it sole 3 million the first week.  The big games out their keep selling as people buy into the system.  So as more people buy 360's, the number of halo 3's sold will keep going up.  Also, review scores can have an effect on game sales, ever heard of bioshock?  Game got perfect reviews, but when it hit stores it hit in small amounts because retailers weren't expecting a big demand for it.  I work at best buy and I remember there being an internal memo about how the unexpected review scores had increased demand and they were doing all they could to get more copies.  Also, look at too human, reviewed terribly, but it was one of those high anticpated exclusives but the sells didn't pan out because it got such terrible reviews. 

What surveys are you talking about, I have never heard of any.  I also remember there being a lot of talk of people being dissapointed with the game when it came out.  I think the lower review score speaks for itself here, you are just trying to throw your opinion in as fact.  Same with Majora's mask, I don't know a single person that likes majora's mask better than OoT.

FF7 and FFX never stopped selling, so they actually had the same install base as XII, or at least X does.  In fact, I can go into best buy right now and go buy FFX.  So it just boils down to which game is better.  Also X has benefited from quite a bit more years in the budget price range.

Thank you for making my point.  MGS3 had no advertising, which equates to lower sales.  Which makes your whole point of using them as examples moot.  Gran Turismo games have always been heavily marketed, which is one of the factors to their incredble sales, same with halo.

As far as the install base, I'm curious how you gather that the core audience actually decreases when the number of systems increases.  Do they all just throw their ps2's away when somebody else goes and buys a new system? 

Ok, the fact of the matter, by having a larger install base you are increasing the chances of growing the core audience.  Say 1 out of 10 gamers in america like FPS games.  Every 10th person that buys a 360 or ps3 grows that core audience.  New people that buy systems have game preferences just like everybody else.  What you are basically saying is after the first 15 million game systems sold, the number of games that sells will always stay the same, because install base doesn't matter.  So why do they even still sell the ps3?  Lets just get rid of the hardware because the games are where all the profit is anyway.  They are going to selling the same number of games anyway, so why sell new ps3's? 

Such a stupid argument. 

 

 



CGI-Quality said:
CMoney said:
gt5 can only dream of reaching HALO 3 type numbers. HALO 3 is a cultural icon, especially in America.

There are other racers like FORZA 3 giving gt5 competition.

Don't fool yourself -
gt5 won't be that much better than forza 3..if at all.

Remember, FORZA 2 got a 90 on metacritic, whil gt prologue only got 82

So.....Halo is a "cultural icon" and Gran Turismo is just another racing game? WoW...

 

 

When was the last time you saw GT on the side of a Coke can?  I am not saying GT is just another racing game, because it was a leader for its time.   But it is no where near as well known as the Halo franchise is with the general public.  



"If you've got them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow."

Quote by- The Imortal John Wayne, the original BADASS!

 

 

 

CMoney said:
gt5 can only dream of reaching HALO 3 type numbers. HALO 3 is a cultural icon, especially in America.

There are other racers like FORZA 3 giving gt5 competition.

Don't fool yourself -
gt5 won't be that much better than forza 3..if at all.

Remember, FORZA 2 got a 90 on metacritic, whil gt prologue only got 82

Remember, GT Prologue is only a beta version.

Also remember that if you include DL sales, GTPrologue is 99% probably above the 3.98million sold of FORZA2.



                            

Around the Network
damndl0ser said:
CGI-Quality said:
CMoney said:
gt5 can only dream of reaching HALO 3 type numbers. HALO 3 is a cultural icon, especially in America.

There are other racers like FORZA 3 giving gt5 competition.

Don't fool yourself -
gt5 won't be that much better than forza 3..if at all.

Remember, FORZA 2 got a 90 on metacritic, whil gt prologue only got 82

So.....Halo is a "cultural icon" and Gran Turismo is just another racing game? WoW...

 

 

When was the last time you saw GT on the side of a Coke can?  I am not saying GT is just another racing game, because it was a leader for its time.   But it is no where near as well known as the Halo franchise is with the general public.  

When was the last time SONY paid out millions and millions of dollars for that to happen?



                            

Carl2291 said:
damndl0ser said:
CGI-Quality said:
CMoney said:
gt5 can only dream of reaching HALO 3 type numbers. HALO 3 is a cultural icon, especially in America.

There are other racers like FORZA 3 giving gt5 competition.

Don't fool yourself -
gt5 won't be that much better than forza 3..if at all.

Remember, FORZA 2 got a 90 on metacritic, whil gt prologue only got 82

So.....Halo is a "cultural icon" and Gran Turismo is just another racing game? WoW...

 

 

When was the last time you saw GT on the side of a Coke can?  I am not saying GT is just another racing game, because it was a leader for its time.   But it is no where near as well known as the Halo franchise is with the general public.  

When was the last time SONY paid out millions and millions of dollars for that to happen?

 







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence

@Carl2291



LOL, is that the best argument you could come up with? M$ Money hats EVERYTHING!!!!!!!

Its called advertising and that is how you get your product out to the mass market. And THE reason everyone knows what Halo3 is. Any "Cultural Icon" you have now days is there because of advertising, and guess what someone had to pay for it.



"If you've got them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow."

Quote by- The Imortal John Wayne, the original BADASS!

 

 

 

CGI-Quality said:
pbroy said:
Carl2291 said:
damndl0ser said:
CGI-Quality said:
CMoney said:
gt5 can only dream of reaching HALO 3 type numbers. HALO 3 is a cultural icon, especially in America.

There are other racers like FORZA 3 giving gt5 competition.

Don't fool yourself -
gt5 won't be that much better than forza 3..if at all.

Remember, FORZA 2 got a 90 on metacritic, whil gt prologue only got 82

So.....Halo is a "cultural icon" and Gran Turismo is just another racing game? WoW...

 

 

When was the last time you saw GT on the side of a Coke can?  I am not saying GT is just another racing game, because it was a leader for its time.   But it is no where near as well known as the Halo franchise is with the general public.  

When was the last time SONY paid out millions and millions of dollars for that to happen?

 

That's not even partially comparable to the amount of marketing Halo 3 had.

 

Hush!!! Your derailing the point. He asked when the last time sony paid millions. ¬_¬

http://news.spong.com/article/17021/Finally_Sonys_PS3_Adverting_Blitz

 







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
damndl0ser said:
@Carl2291



LOL, is that the best argument you could come up with? M$ Money hats EVERYTHING!!!!!!!

Its called advertising and that is how you get your product out to the mass market. And THE reason everyone knows what Halo3 is. Any "Cultural Icon" you have now days is there because of advertising, and guess what someone had to pay for it.

I never said they moneyhatted anything.

I said they paid millions upon millions for the amount of advertising.

And no, not everyone gets "cultural icon" status from paying for it.

@pbroy, show me some killzone coke can? Like i highlighted.