I usually go to Metacritic and look at the spread of scores (not the average), then weight them depending on how much stock I personally put in each review source. I'll read the full reviews of the ones that I deem worthwhile.
For a single site, I trust IGN most of the time. More than other sites anyway.
If there's any person who's opinion I will agree with/trust 9 times out of 10, it's Tycho/Jerry Holkins from Penny Arcade.
Crusty VGchartz old timer who sporadically returns & posts. Let's debate nebulous shit and expand our perpectives. Or whatever.











), Metal Gear Solid, take your pic. Some of GameSpot's notoriously infamous reviews. Not to mention how their reviews are never more than two (tiny) pages and leave out a lot of important stuff, they no longer have component scores and only score to .5s, and for some reason they take forever to write reviews, except, of course on the 360. The 360 version of a game will be reviewed on opening day, the PS3 version reviewed a week later.