nightsurge said:
Then it should also read: "how is the PS3 losing by 30k per week to a console that sells most commonly at $300/$400, even with the more, "better" exclusives on PS3?" Since about 45% of the 360's sales are arcade models. The other 55% is Pro/Elite at $300/$400. Could be closer to 50/50 now, but regardless, half of those sales are not the cheap $200 price point, so PS3 lovers can not ignore the higher priced SKU sales and think that it is always a $200 gap. |
How can you use the line "most commonly" and then go on to say that theres a good chance that the sales are 50/50 now? Just like you say that PS3 lovers can't ignore the high price SKU sales, 360 lovers cannot ignore the lower priced SKU sales. To deny that 360 is outselling PS3 because of its pricepoint is redicolous. It was getting outsold every week when the PS3's price was at a more competetive level.
This thread pretends like 360 is somehow miracolousley outselling a console that has better exclusives. The word "better" is extremely debatable but I'm going by what is said in the OP: 3 big exclusives vs. 15.
Also, Numonex, 1st party >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3rd party. The highest rated, most universally acclaimed, exclusives of this gen have mostly been first party. The unreliability of third parties has never stood out more than it does today. Bioshock was at one point the 360's highest rated exclusive...and would be today had it not gone multiplat.









