perpride said:
How can you use the line "most commonly" and then go on to say that theres a good chance that the sales are 50/50 now? Just like you say that PS3 lovers can't ignore the high price SKU sales, 360 lovers cannot ignore the lower priced SKU sales. To deny that 360 is outselling PS3 because of its pricepoint is redicolous. It was getting outsold every week when the PS3's price was at a more competetive level. This thread pretends like 360 is somehow miracolousley outselling a console that has better exclusives. The word "better" is extremely debatable but I'm going by what is said in the OP: 3 big exclusives vs. 15. Also, Numonex, 1st party >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3rd party. The highest rated, most universally acclaimed, exclusives of this gen have mostly been first party. The unreliability of third parties has never stood out more than it does today. Bioshock was at one point the 360's highest rated exclusive...and would be today had it not gone multiplat.
|
If they are indeed 50/50 then my claim does not fit, but I'm tired of people saying "Oh look 360 is half the price" and do not include the other SKUs into consideration. It is not because the 360 arcade is $200 cheaper that it is selling more. It is because it is $200. Once the other SKU's get that low and the arcade even lower, sales will absolutely erupt because consumers love to buy their consoles at $200 or less 
Also, I think when he says 3rd Party>>>1st party, he means if you have the most 3rd party support, you get the most games, most content, and most sales. It happened with the PS2. Sony just failed to capatilize on it this generation.







