theprof00 said: you can't apply home economics to the world market mafoo. Things will get better, and he says we will cross that bridge when we come to it because by the time we get there, things should have improved. Why harp about a figure that we don't know. We could end up with a huge surplus. That's what it means to cross the bridge whenn you come to it. |
It's not home economics, it's economics 101 that we apply at home. How is spending more money then you have going to make things better? China and the rest of the world are not buying our debt. This means we must print money.
The only way out of this, is to inflate our way out. inflation is a regressive tax, and hurts the poor more then anyone. If the dollar becomes worth 80% of what it used to be worth, you have just taxed EVERY dollar by 20%. There is no tax deduction for that. Everyone pays it. Why are you for a tax on the poor when we are in such economic hardships already?
Why are we here in the first place? The answer is as a nation, we spent more money then we had. Why is the solution to spend even more money that we don't have?
You like the guy, great. I like him too. But when you hire someone to do a job, and they make things worse, the solution is not to ignore the situation and hope for the best. The solution is definitely not getting pissed at those who are doing something about it.