Now that's just bullshit.

GG have already released four freaking patches within two months just to satisfy all the crybabies on the forum. You can criticize them for many things, but one thing for sure is that, they are working hard.

Does it atleast have 2 player split screen on multiplayer? I don't know how some games get away with not including that... COD4, im looking at you!

Read my other post, i was not being serious.

"eh.. i didnt mean to be serious, if anything GG is the best Developers that listens to their fans, i mean look at the forums you cant ask a question unless they answer it , and listen to you.

but the thing is, i dont know why they dont want the Co-op thing."

singleplayer was pretty forgettable anyway.. i rather have dlc for multiplayer than the opportunity to be simultaneously bored along with a friend playing the campaign again

Ohh, my mistake then, I jumped to conclusions way too fast.

 no,  it doesnt, but it didnt stop COD4 from being great.

What got my attention for this game rather than its awesomesauce graphics, was that they had annouced 4-player split screen co-op. It just made my eyes lit up as if i won the lottery. But now its been crushed and reduce to nothing more but a simple single player game.

I found the game to be fun enough, both single and multiplayer. Though I always find Co-op to be fun, you have to realize they can't just patch the game to let someone else take control of one of your teammates. They'd have to redesign the battles in every level to make the co op worthwhile. Now, patching in splitscreen multiplayer would be cool.

Its great till your freinds come over...then you switch to Halo 3.

i was about to say that i think it would have sold better with co-op....but that would have decreased the graphical quality of the game which was the main driving factor for hype... so i figured it probably wouldnt have helped at all.

anyways, i think it would have been a better game with co op play