You said that Sony fanboys find the good in any news.  I pride myself in being a positive person and like to keep a positive outlook. 

What I did was point out what I see as being the opposite to that.  If you were a generally positive person you might have seen that and not taken it as an accusation...

@non-gravity

Maybe you should :p

Let's get back on-topic folks.

LOL!  Nothing quite like a duel!

@Darth, City

Yes I'm positive, yes I have a PS3, yes I'm a good person, and I'm pretty sure you both are too (and yes, GG should had include co-op!).

Let's get back to topic.

A hug.

you people are such a pain. If I had been here 1 hour ago I would have banned both of you.

eh.. i didnt mean to be serious, if anything GG is the best Developers that listens to their fans, i mean look at the forums you cant ask a question unless they answer it , and listen to you.

but the thing is, i dont know why they dont want the Co-op thing.

@nordlead, I know, I myself have 2 communities, I'm sorry again.

@Kylie, somewhere I read something about co-op coming in the form of DLC, I must be honest, I was hopping for it.

Offtopic: yes you are correct, that's one of my points.

@Pullus, and that's why I don't understand why it doesn't has co-op. Maybe it's too expensive? The game was already expensive..... I dunno.....

Or maybe when they started to make the game (2004?) co-op wasn't such an important thing..... Maybe....

Maybe we will never know! LOL

I'd be happy with Multi Player only, It's that good IMO.

I personally dont care about co-op campaigns, never have. Its an over-rated feature. So I am glad they didnt put it in, some areas it just wouldnt have fit well and felt half-assed. But thats just my opinion

If they added co-op split screen I'd care only because I could then play with my brother. Other than that, I've never cared for co-op.