By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Better for all, Capitalism or Socialism?

Dr.KennethNoisewater said:
Capitalism spreads wealth unevenly, Socialism spreads poverty equally.

Capitalism is better.

This pretty much sums it up.

While socialism sounds and looks good on paper, it's really not practical.

 



Around the Network
mrstickball said:
Am I the only one that finds it odd that the only examples of properly run countries with massive social programs are infinitely smaller than America?

Denmark is about 1.8% the size of America (by population). You don't think that has *something* good to do with how their state is run?

I cannot wait to see what socialism does in the European Union - French workers being taxed to pay for healthcare in Turkey and Lithuania. Once that happens, then I think we can make an apt comparison on US capitalism and European socialism. Otherwise, we're trying to argue much smaller countries vs. much, much larger ones.

One could point to Singapore being a fantastic model of socialism in many various forms...But do you think that'd work on a much larger scale?

And I also find it strange that people are so willing to have their freedoms (choices in education, healthcare, and other provisions) taken away, yet decry the same governments for the notion of changing abortion, gay marriage, and other laws. Why is it that we're so touchy on the government being powerful in some areas, but willing to let them have major says in other areas?

 

I'm all for socialized programs, and also for government not to meddle in abortion gay rights etc.  That is, they are left to the people that concerns them to choose.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

GamingChartzFTW said:
tombi123 said:
TheRealMafoo said:




I care that the poor's lifestyle is getting better faster then the poor's lifestyle would in a different system. Today, the poor live longer, eat better, live in better housing, have better services, and safety then they did 100 years ago,
all because of Capitalism. < Sources? -GamingChartzFTW-

 

I've never read such shit in my life... do you even know any poor people?

The words of a man who has distanced himself from the less fortunate.

Sad.

Every 'Human Generation' eventually gets better, but how about helping that small percentage who always fail?

 

lol, I used to be very poor. one month I only had 20 bucks to eat off of, so I went to the local grocery store, and asked the general manager what the most efficient use of my money was. He took me in the back and sold me a day old expired case of frozen waffles (I am sure he pocketed the 20). It's crazy that I still like them after that month. I look back now, and realize it never dawned on me to ask for government assistance. I figured it was my fault I got into this mess, it was my job to get myself out of it.

Anyway, I figured out what it took not to be poor, and I did the things it took to get there.

The funny thing, is my success is not what gave me these political views, my political views gave me this success. If you are the kind of person who feels your stake in life is solely the responsibility of yourself, you tend to do better in life then if your one to expect others to improve your life for you. Just my opinion anyway.

And I am not rich by any means, I make about 80K a year.



mrstickball said:
Am I the only one that finds it odd that the only examples of properly run countries with massive social programs are infinitely smaller than America?  Denmark is about 1.8% the size of America (by population). You don't think that has *something* good to do with how their state is run?

And I also find it strange that people are so willing to have their freedoms (choices in education, healthcare, and other provisions) taken away, yet decry the same governments for the notion of changing abortion, gay marriage, and other laws.

1. There is no reason to believe that economics behaves differently between two full scale examples.  If you do believe so, then there is really no reason to argue because America is the only example of a first world country with a large population.  I guess a better argument for you would be that the there's a population size that, if a country surpasses it, it is unable to govern efficiently.

2. No one is taking your freedom of choice away.  You can go to whatever school you want, you can go to whatever hospital or doctor you want (more freedom than many American healthcare providers), and you have to option to pay for these services yourself in the private market.  The only difference is the option to have the government fund your education and healthcare.



socialism sounds better in theory but capitalism more reliable/relevant in application



Around the Network
TheRealMafoo said:

 

lol, I used to be very poor. one month I only had 20 bucks to eat off of, so I went to the local grocery store, and asked the general manager what the most efficient use of my money was. He took me in the back and sold me a day old expired case of frozen waffles (I am sure he pocketed the 20). It's crazy that I still like them after that month. I look back now, and realize it never dawned on me to ask for government assistance. I figured it was my fault I got into this mess, it was my job to get myself out of it.

Anyway, I figured out what it took not to be poor, and I did the things it took to get there.

The funny thing, is my success is not what gave me these political views, my political views gave me this success. If you are the kind of person who feels your stake in life is solely the responsibility of yourself, you tend to do better in life then if your one to expect others to improve your life for you. Just my opinion anyway.

And I am not rich by any means, I make about 80K a year.

i dont know about the US, but in the UK, the average wage is 22k a year, so 80k a year is almost 4x the average wage here, i mean, i would definetley call someone on 80k a year Rich.

 



tombi123 said:
TheRealMafoo said:
tombi123 said:
I think it is very pessimistic to suggest that money is the greatest motivator. In fact it makes me ashamed to be human.

 

I think the opposite. Money is a way to transfer and store your efforts. It's a way to build something better for your children, or a way to take your time, and donate it to charities.

It's a measure of hard work, and dedication.

To all the RPG fans, it's Real Life XP :)

 

In no way is money a reflection of hard work and dedication. I work in a restuarant kitchen. The head chef work 15 hour shifts, 6 days a week. For the amount of hard work and dedication he puts in he should be a millionaire. He isn't, he works for a modest wage.

I'm guessing you earn quite a lot...

I just feel that our obsession with money is holding human potential back...

 

I worded that poorly. I should have said “hard work and dedication to bettering society”.

I am sure your co-worker works hard, but if he was hit by a bus tomorrow, his job could be filled in an afternoon. For different reasons, the same applies to a school teachers, police officers, or firemen.

Teaching is an incredibly noble profession, and extremely valuable thing for a country, but the individual who teaches is not worth more, because so many people of equal competence exist. If no one wanted to teach people, they would get paid a lot more.

If you need 10 teachers but have 20, you becoming a the 21st teacher does nothing to better anything.

A great baseball player is worth all that money, because of two reasons. One is he makes the owner more then he costs (that's the bet anyway when they give him that salary), and because if he was not there, no one else could do his job as good as him.

If everyone could play baseball like a-rod, he wouldn't make any money. While bettering society though entertainment is not nearly as noble, it's still a better society with popular sports figures in it. Millions of people get a lot of enjoyment from watching baseball, and thus the people who provide that enjoyment are paid handsomely for it.

If your friend wants more money, he needs to find something less easy to replace.



SciFiBoy said:
TheRealMafoo said:

 

lol, I used to be very poor. one month I only had 20 bucks to eat off of, so I went to the local grocery store, and asked the general manager what the most efficient use of my money was. He took me in the back and sold me a day old expired case of frozen waffles (I am sure he pocketed the 20). It's crazy that I still like them after that month. I look back now, and realize it never dawned on me to ask for government assistance. I figured it was my fault I got into this mess, it was my job to get myself out of it.

Anyway, I figured out what it took not to be poor, and I did the things it took to get there.

The funny thing, is my success is not what gave me these political views, my political views gave me this success. If you are the kind of person who feels your stake in life is solely the responsibility of yourself, you tend to do better in life then if your one to expect others to improve your life for you. Just my opinion anyway.

And I am not rich by any means, I make about 80K a year.

i dont know about the US, but in the UK, the average wage is 22k a year, so 80k a year is almost 4x the average wage here, i mean, i would definetley call someone on 80k a year Rich.

 

 

In the US, the average salary for someone my age, is about 60k. I am about to turn 40, so I would guess from that graph at about 60K

http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Country=United_States/Salary/by_Age

EDIT: I make 54.6k Pounds.



TheRealMafoo said:

 

In the US, the average salary for someone my age, is about 60k. I am about to turn 40, so I would guess from that graph at about 60K

http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Country=United_States/Salary/by_Age

 

 

ah, fair enough, in the US then, i wouldnt consider you Rich

edit: 54.6k, ok, id still consider you pretty well off on that here, its still more than double what either of my parents earn.



SciFiBoy said:
TheRealMafoo said:

 

In the US, the average salary for someone my age, is about 60k. I am about to turn 40, so I would guess from that graph at about 60K

http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Country=United_States/Salary/by_Age

 

 

ah, fair enough, in the US then, i wouldnt consider you Rich, but if you moved here, i would (assuming you were earning £80k)

 

Not sure if you saw my edit, but 80K US = 54.6K UK.