No it is not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo
Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.
Planned Parenthood was started as a pro eugenics organization, which means they were aimed at getting "undesirables" to stop breeding. While one out of about every five white pregnancies end in abortion, nearly one out of every two African-American pregnancies end in abortion.
Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
— Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire
| Tyrannical said: Planned Parenthood was started as a pro eugenics organization, which means they were aimed at getting "undesirables" to stop breeding. While one out of about every five white pregnancies end in abortion, nearly one out of every two African-American pregnancies end in abortion. |
...
oh dear god, eugenics?
who brought up eugenics and why?
no-one is pro eugenics i hope
SciFiBoy said:
... |
Planned Parenthoodwas founded for the purpose of eugenics.
It's not a coincidence so many abortion clinics are located in black neighborhoods. Were you not aware of Liberalism's dirty little secret?
Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
— Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire
I want to ask a potentially silly question to pro-choicers.
If killing a fetus is not wrong in some way because the fetus is not alive, then do you support the right to bottle the fetus for safe keeping? I know people sometimes do this with their kidney stones when they get removed, and I figure it's a similiar thing, both being just objects.
Just want a quick opinion from a few people.
Edit: One more question.
Plastic surgeons, dentists, medical companies selling drugs can all advertise the pros of their services/products. Should abortion clinics be able to advertise the pros of abortion? As far as surgery goes, it's just another non-life threatening surgery just like plastic surgery is(usually, I know there are exceptions).
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
I think saving anything stranger then teeth is just bizzare.
Like how for instance Chinese eunuchs use to save their manhood by pickling it in a jar. That is just too odd for me.
Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
— Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire
Kasz and I are on the same page with respect to abortion.
| Kasz216 said: It depends on the trimester if you ask me. Up until the 12th week it's just something that could be a person. Not an actual person. Not much different then like... masterbation. Or using a condom when having sex. Just my opinion though. I do feel for people who think every abortion is a murder. Gotta feel like living in Nazi germany but the world is nazi germany or something. |
Agree with everything you've said here.
| Onyxmeth said: I want to ask a potentially silly question to pro-choicers. If killing a fetus is not wrong in some way because the fetus is not alive, then do you support the right to bottle the fetus for safe keeping? I know people sometimes do this with their kidney stones when they get removed, and I figure it's a similiar thing, both being just objects. Just want a quick opinion from a few people. Edit: One more question. Plastic surgeons, dentists, medical companies selling drugs can all advertise the pros of their services/products. Should abortion clinics be able to advertise the pros of abortion? As far as surgery goes, it's just another non-life threatening surgery just like plastic surgery is(usually, I know there are exceptions). |
The second question is easy to answer. Yes, they should.
The first question I want to answer Yes, but for some strange reason, it just feels wrong. I mean I don't consider it a human life, thus I am ok with the abortion, but keeping it in a jar just seems strange.
I also don't consider a relative that has passed away to be a living person, but having it stuffed and sitting in your living room seems like something I would be against as well.
TheRealMafoo said:
The second question is easy to answer. Yes, they should. |
A relative that has passed away WAS a living person. You also may not kill a relative, but you can remove a fetus. They are not comparable. A fetus is nothing more than an object.
So to bring the first question back to you with that straightened out, why do you feel wrong about the bottling of a fetus?
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
