So does Eugenics, the greater good and survival of man's greatest instead of inferiors. But that doesn't mean it is morally justified. There are a lot of things that helps humanity, and yet we don't do them because it isn't right.

The way I look at it, even if the child that wasn't aborted grows up to have a criminal life, at least it has the life and choices to live instead of not having that chance whatsoever.

The pictures are disturbing, but so is the fact that you couldn't present a sound argument against abortion, and felt the need to resort to pictures. If you truly believe in something then at least do your best. This is laziness and borderline offensive. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion. I am pro-choice and I can't stand abortion. Sometimes though it's not always feasible for the world to revolve around our personal moral standards. We must bend to give others the rights they deserve, while still not agreeing with the choices they make.

To further my point, I find suicide repugnant but it's your individual choice to do it. Now I can be shown a picture of a man with no face after shooting himself with a sawed off shotgun and be horrified by it, but that isn't going to change my opinion that he has the right to be that stupid.

@Bursche-No problem. I found the link very interesting myself.

I'll comment on the suicide analogy first. The difference is the baby does not have the "choice" wether he or she wants to be aborted. It is other people making that decision for them concerning thier life. While suicide....

Now one point of your statement I really liked is when you said "We must bend to give others the rights they deserve, while still not agreeing with the choices they make." So why not bend our personal beliefs to give that unborn child's "rights" it deserve to life instead of taking it away because of the selfish ideology of others. 

Because that would be making the world bend around your personal moral standards...

No matter of how you look at it, it's a living human being regardless of which stage of development he or she is in.

Thats just a plain wrong statement because the way I look at it its not a living human being regardless of which stage of development it is in. Its also the way most pro-choicers look at it. What you should have said is 'The way I look at it, it's a living human being regardless of which stage of development he or she is in.'

It wasn't being lazy that made me post the pictures and while offensive they serve a purpose. Most people go into the argument of abortion without seeing the actual procedure (which I decided against posting a video) or what happens to the baby and develope thier opiniopns by what the media says or by the opinions of others. 

Disturbing pictures do not an argument make. Open heart surgery is also a fairly messy business and there are some truly gruesome pictures of it, doesn't make it a bad thing though.

I reckon that nobody here argues, that a dead foetus isn't a pity and it would be far better, if the foetus would be born and grow up as a human being.

But I see so many problems with banning abortion

1. What are the reason for abortions? I reckon it's in many cases pure desperation due to most importantly rape, fear of the future, etc. or it's just because the mother faces severe problems to a birth which might cost here life.

2. Would a woman who feels desperated do it anyway or not? Abortion have been there before science made it save and a lot of women died and are still dying because of doing it with needles and other things.

3. So isn't denying them medical treadment, denying THEM one of their human rights?

4. Wouldn't it be better for churches to provide more services to show the women a way to keep the unborn, WITHOUT judging them as murders if they make an abortion and make them feel even more miserable as they were before?

5. What would be the penality for an abortion? And should somebody who saw no other choices be punished?

But these are just the problems with banning abortion, as I see no other way than to let or keep it legalized. I'm not a physician nor a human biologist, so I keep it to the experts to define the time of an abortion.

In Germany its illegal, but not punished, if it happens in the first 12 weeks and after you went to a pregnancy consultation. Exception apply, if the life of the mother is in danger or the child is severe disabled. Then abortion is de facto also allowed at a later stage.

I'll comment on the suicide analogy first. The difference is the baby does not have the "choice" wether he or she wants to be aborted. It is other people making that decision for them concerning thier life. While suicide....

Now one point of your statement I really liked is when you said "We must bend to give others the rights they deserve, while still not agreeing with the choices they make." So why not bend our personal beliefs to give that unborn child's "rights" it deserve to life instead of taking it away because of the selfish ideology of others. No matter of how you look at it, it's a living human being regardless of which stage of development he or she is in.

It wasn't being lazy that made me post the pictures and while offensive they serve a purpose. Most people go into the argument of abortion without seeing the actual procedure (which I decided against posting a video) or what happens to the baby and develope thier opiniopns by what the media says or by the opinions of others.