By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Analyst: Wii Is 'Fool's Gold' For Game Investors

The whole article boils down to:

"Third party games don't sell well on the Wii, except for the ones that do, if you combine the competition, and ignore the fact that existing data are based on the fact that nobody but Nintendo has tried to put out any blockbuster games on it. Something, something, something, casual gamers."

I'm not even going to dignify this analyst by acknowledging it.



Super World Cup Fighter II: Championship 2010 Edition

Around the Network

I agree with the posted article...And I knew everyone else would disagree...especially the wii fanboys...don't you lot like LOGIC?



Samus Aran said:

Does it really matter... The only thing that matters to me is that nintendo games sell well and 3rd party games that show great quality(Madworld isn't enough quality for me, but it's a nice try)

RE4 is a good quality game for the wii and it has good sales, but it's a gc port though.

Then we have monster hunter 3, the conduit and ghostbusters wii that will PROBABLY have good quality and I hope these games get good sales. Well, monster hunter 3 will sell good, that's almost a fact, but the other 2... They can go either way if you ask me.

 

 

You have to use examples of games that haven't even been released yet to back up your argument?

 

I don't believe you.



Kenny said:
The whole article boils down to:

"Third party games don't sell well on the Wii, except for the ones that do, if you combine the competition, and ignore the fact that existing data are based on the fact that nobody but Nintendo has tried to put out any blockbuster games on it. Something, something, something, casual gamers."

I'm not even going to dignify this analyst by acknowledging it.

 

 

you just did.



Baggins said:
Kenny said:
The whole article boils down to:

"Third party games don't sell well on the Wii, except for the ones that do, if you combine the competition, and ignore the fact that existing data are based on the fact that nobody but Nintendo has tried to put out any blockbuster games on it. Something, something, something, casual gamers."

I'm not even going to dignify this analyst by acknowledging it.

 

 

you just did.

Please don't start us on an argument about meta-references.  We could be here 'till tomorrow.



Super World Cup Fighter II: Championship 2010 Edition

Around the Network
famousringo said:
The comments section to that article was funny. People who don't know the difference between WM+ and sixaxis, don't know what's first party and what's third. I'll forgive them for not knowing what "AAA" means, since it's about as confused and meaningless as "casual" and "hardcore" at this point.


It's got something to do with batteries right?



Kasz216 said:
famousringo said:
The comments section to that article was funny. People who don't know the difference between WM+ and sixaxis, don't know what's first party and what's third. I'll forgive them for not knowing what "AAA" means, since it's about as confused and meaningless as "casual" and "hardcore" at this point.


It's got something to do with batteries right?

 

Either that or getting your name first in the phone book.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

HappySqurriel said:

Realistically, who would follow the advice of analysts on what to invest in when they demonstrated their complete lack of understanding of the market by predicting the Wii would be in last place with less than 20 Million units sold; and advized third party publishers to ignore the Wii in favour of the PS3 which was ensured market dominance ...

From my perspective, there are quite a few traditional/dedicated gamers who own the Wii (and traditional/dedicated gamers are fairly easy to motivate to buy a new console), development costs are low and the userbase is quite large ... I would personally suggest that third party publishers stop focusing so much on targeting a particular demographic as much as focusing on delivering a high quality game with broad appeal to the Wii.


Quite a few?

PSN - hanafuda

Even if this guy is totally off base, why do so many people here think they have the answer? We're interested in video game sales enough to frequent a website dedicated to it, but as far as I know the vast majority of people here are not formally part of the video game industry. People here are throwing around ideas, which is great, but the hostility towards this guy is totally unwarranted and some people just need to take their involvement in this less seriously.



Demon's Souls Official Thread  | Currently playing: Left 4 Dead 2, LittleBigPlanet 2, Magicka

I think all of it is a self-fulfilling prophesy.

Many 3rd parties did not bet on Wii on the onset of this Gen.

Nintendo released major titles during the 1st year (365 days).

Third parties saw that the Nintendo titles released sold better so they held off and hoped that 360 and PS3 would do better.

Third Parties release some overly hype HD game that cost then "trillions" to make when it is released on 360 and PS3 it does not do as well as they hoped OR in the pracess of making a game they run into money problem SO- in order to make money they make ports OR a quick cheap game to Wii that is now doing great.

Consumers try out the rushed games and then find that those games do not make them feel lke they felt when they played Nintendo games.

3rd parties complain.

Here is my point if a company consistently turns out good products I am more likely to try their products, even if it is something I don't normally use. Just like people with Apple.

They have to realize that the "new" people Nintendo are bringing to gaming don't know who they are. They know who Nintendo is because of Wii Sports and because their name is on the system. So why do they think that their rushed/ ports/ crap ware is not going to leave them with a bad name (even if they release a great game later).

I think they need to understand the market better. Gaming is more and more common and most people are not like us, they don't read gaming mags. or sites they just go by Word of Mouth or Box Art.


( On the flip side there are Nintendo fans who do not play anything but Nintendo but Nintendo has proven itself. And they have proven many times that they can almost single-handedly keep a system breathing (GC, N64). )



At any rate they now have a window to make games Nintendo has purposely stopped releasing games in order to give the 3rders a chance (Will they take it?)