| SlorgNet said: Won't happen. It's too late for HDDVD, the biggest studios are behind Blu-Ray, and 4.5 million PS3s are already out in the wild. Microsoft shot themselves in the foot, by not including HDDVD or any next-gen storage media in the 360. |
You're wrong there. Microsoft didn't shoot themselves in the foot by not mandatorily including HD DVD in their console. Offering it as a cheap (compared to stand-alone players) addon actually was the smartest thing they could have done.
If they had wanted to include it, they couldn't have released the 360 in winter 2005 in the first place. Also, do you think the 360 would have sold 11 million by now had it costed $600 instead of $400? Instead, Sony appear to have shot themselves in the foot by including BR into the PS3 (launch delay, high price). Imagine a PS3 launch in spring 2006 at $400 (which would have been possible without BR) - would Sony be in the same position they are now then? The Wii wasn't even released at that time.
Now the letdown on the console battlefield would be alright if the HD software media format war had gone well instead - since it was Sony's strategy to gain an early victory there by exploiting their superior position in the console war. But from my point of view it looks like Sony is going to lose the format war as well. Apart from the Blu-ray fanboys at Fox and Sony themselves I consider it very much possible for the remaining big studios to become either HD DVD exclusive or least format neutral.
| SlorgNet said: Sony's BluRay strategy is a product of bitter experience - a long time ago, they had a great product, the Betamax, and got clobbered by Toshiba's less sophisticated VHS standard, because Toshiba emphasized access and availability. |
VHS was/is a product of JVC, not Toshiba.










