By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Is the videogame king worthy? (from EW)

http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/03/nintendo-wii.html

Nintendo Wii: Is the videogame king worthy of its throne?

Mar 25, 2009, 09:00 AM | by John Young

Categories: Videogames

The Nintendo Wii, the innovative videogame console with the motion-sensitive controller, will pass 50 million worldwide sales by the end of March, Variety reports. The Wii has reached this milestone in just 28 months -- eight months quicker than Sony's PlayStation 2 did.

This leaves me with one question: Why? Why has the Wii flourished beyond everyone's wildest expectations? It's truly a David vs. Goliath outcome, with the little, inexpensive, and inelegant Wii triumphing over Microsoft and Sony's we-will-crush-you-with-our-mighty-computing-prowess Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 systems. Clearly, the appeal of the Wii is in its intuitive controller, which allows everyone from 4 year olds to 70 year olds to play without having to worry about executing 25-button combos. A crudely made game such as Wii Sports is nevertheless enjoyable because it feels so natural and rewarding, as if you were actually swinging a tennis racket or golf club.

But there's one anomaly in the Wii's success: its games. Simply put, the Wii is lacking in high-quality software. At Metacritic, a site that compiles videogame reviews and spits out an overall score, the Wii has just eight titles with a score of 90 or higher. By comparison, the Xbox 360 has 21 games. Over the past few months, 360 and PS3 owners have been treated to a flurry of critically acclaimed games: Resident Evil 5, MLB 09, Killzone 2, Street Fighter IV, Halo Wars, etc. But the Wii's only noteworthy release of late seems to be the ultra-violent MadWorld.

I'm not trying to slam the Wii. Rather, I'm suggesting that the Wii represents a shift in the videogaming paradigm. A system's raw graphical power used to be its selling point; you bought a Nintendo 64 because, OMG, Mario was in three freaking dimensions! But the Wii doesn't hold a candle to the computational abilities of the PS3 and Xbox 360. Instead, the Wii showcases an all-too-overlooked quality: ingenuity. How appropriate that in these economically desolate times, the videogame king would be the system that shook things up (and did so for an affordable price). It may not be pretty, and it may have its hiccups, but the Wii ultimately deserves its throne -- at least for now.

PopWatchers, how do you feel about the Wii passing 50 million sales? Did Nintendo know exactly what it was doing, or was the Wii's success sheer luck? And which system would you want to be stuck with on a deserted island?

 

----

Interesting take here on the Wii's current success.  But in the end, I think "they" get it -- that interface has people's interaction (with the game and with each other) has triumphed over pixels.


Mike from Morgantown

 

I do "love" the reference to meta-rankings because I wonder how many Wii games have lost 5-10 points solely because of not having the graphical "firepower" of the other consoles (but otherwise the graphics were fine and did not detract from gameplay).



      


I am Mario.


I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble.

Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492

NNID: Mike_INTV

Around the Network

A decent read even though there was nothing too new about any information. I think the gaming community are finally realizing that graphics power isn't the only deciding factor on a consoles success.



sethnintendo said:
A decent read even though there was nothing too new about any information. I think the gaming community are finally realizing that graphics power isn't the only deciding factor on a consoles success.

 

 

They should have figured that one out previous gen when ps2 won.

I knew the wii was going to dominate this gen, where as everyone else was thinking Sony or Microsoft would win.

Cheap console+ innovative control+Mario+ CATCHY name+ nice looking thing= WORLD DOMINATION

 

 



I see it more like "everybody buys a car, usually cheap or budget options to get the job done. But some people who like their cars get bentleys and porches. But that's only some people"



I really still cant see why people use Metacritic as a measure of quality, i mean Mario Kart is not on the list of AAA games there but the game itself is one of the most fun titles ever, Fire Emblem is not there but is as hardcore as it gets.



Around the Network
Lolcislaw said:
I really still cant see why people use Metacritic as a measure of quality, i mean Mario Kart is not on the list of AAA games there but the game itself is one of the most fun titles ever, Fire Emblem is not there but is as hardcore as it gets.

It's one of the best-known faults of human thinking: the drive to turn to evidence which reaffirms your own beliefs, even if that evidence is inconclusive, partial, or useless in any perspective outside of a very limited application. MetaCritic does not actually measure "quality", because "quality" is entirely in the eyes of the beholder.

I know not many people like to admit it, but quantity is a far more reliable source of information, and the only trait which holds any meaning in terms of whether a game is truly "worthy". It doesn't really matter if a game is scored low on MetaCritic, because if it's one of the top selling games of all time, that clearly illustrates that it's successful, even if that site does not agree. In any and all markets, it's more important to make a profit than it is to get critical acclaim, because critical acclaim does not do the job of paying the bills anywhere near as well as selling 10 million copies of a game.



Sky Render - Sanity is for the weak.