True, even I was trying to argue quality.  However, whatever someone thinks is quality could be consider garbage to another person.  So trying to argue about what system has the best library of games available is just going to be pointless in the end when everyone's mind is already made up.  Arguing about opinions is what people like to do.  It is a lot easier than arguing over facts since there is no arguement because it is a fact.

Do you have a simple grasp of the English language? I said it will be a few years before it reaches that point. So now you are the newest most ignorant post I've seen on this site. Congrats.

Doesn't matter what he prefers when he is claiming it has a better library. He isn't saying the best games overall. He is saying that a system of 2 years has a better library than a system of 10 years with many more games. I even said the GC and Xbox had a greater library than any system this generation. Hell I thought the Gamecube had the better library than PS2 last gen. I supported GC the most.

Let me know when you develop some reading skills. Then we can talk.

In fact I don't have to argue with any of you stupid idiotic and moronic fanboys cause this whole topic is subjective for every generation last gen and back. Only when a new console is out then it takes a while to reach the likes of previous generations.

To me all you fanboys can take you PS3/360/Wii consoles and shove them. I would've been damn happy if SNES and Sega was releasing new games to this day.

Exactly. If he would've read more into I was just suggesting we should wait longer for the new generation to establish itself before we start calling it better than previous generations. Because my opinion the SNES had the best and was the best.

It will be hard for anything to top that.

1º i'm from argentina and i'm still learning english

2º calm down

3ºso, you're claiming that quantity> quality (subjective) hum..

actually he isnt. He is claiming just the fact there are more great titles on the PS2 than Wii which is true. There are hundreds of good games on the PS2.

still he is by far out of line, so he has been reported.

1) Does it look like I care. If this whole site was in your language I would not be posting on it. (But if I offend you then I am sorry)

2) I'm perfectly calm. Unless your watchin me from somewhere. Then that would be scary. It's not like I wave my hands around in the air in anger.

3) I still think you need a grasp of the language and grammer period. So by your theory when the Wii was launched it had the greatest game selection of all time? Even though it was less than 30 or so games?

I'm not speaking of quantity nor qualty. I'm speaking of establishment. You can have the 5 best games of all time but if no one makes games for your then your library will suck overall.

And yes the Wii might have the greater library when it has the highest "Quantity" of great games. In this case quantity co-exist with quality.

What the hell? We gladly welcome all posters of all levels of English ability. Take a hike. I think the Wii has a better library than the PS2 ALREADY, AS OF RIGHT NOW! Only thing on the PS2 that I think the Wii needs really badly is a Katamari game. But I still think the Wii wins thanks to Wii Sports, Elebits, and the Virtual Console.

All Sony has to do is made an HD PS2 and add motion controls and sell it for $150.
Hell forget the HD. Just make a "Waggle PS2". It would sell like hotcakes to hungry lumberjacks on a cold Alaskan morning.

Don't use that term. It just makes them think its ok to call us that.