By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why Microsoft is afraid of Sony

welshbloke said:
WereKitten, Except that does not take into account a console increasing its growth later in its lifecycle which is actually happen as the upturn you indicate by your graph has been over hauled which means at current trends the PS3 could never catch rather it will decline.

Who said the PS3 will catch up? It depends on how the sales will stabilize in the next years, of course. I was only pointing out that the poster before me took a wrong logical step (that would only hold if sales were constant)

 



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman

Around the Network

we know sooner or later ps3 will catch up with the 360 it is inevitable.



gotta love how there is a typo in there:

"since many people will rather pay online for free than pay for it."

play online for free. I wonder if they have editors from this site, or if just any opinionated piece of trash article is posted.

I am not saying I disagree with the opinions, I think Microsoft should be afraid, for the reasons that were pointed out, but please... this is a very unprofessional article.



̶3̶R̶D̶   2ND! Place has never been so sweet.


Slimebeast said:
numonex said:

First-Party Support

Microsoft is growing heavily reliant on third-party support. They recently shut down Ensemble Studios (Halo Wars), let Bungie (Halo 3) go independent and did not attempt to buy Bioware (Mass Effect). Since third-party gaming companies can switch alliances at any time, Microsoft is walking a tight rope.

Sony, on the other hand, is quietly building up the biggest first-part development core in the gaming industry. Their studios span all three major regions (Japan, North America and Europe) and feature tremendous talent. First-party Playstation 3 games are gaining praise and popularity. With more third-party opting to release multiplatform games, exclusive games on the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 may ultimately determined the battle between the two high-definition systems. With less fire power, Microsoft should definitely be concern about Sony.

 

 This is circular reasoning. Who came first, the chicken or the egg?

MS closing first party studios should be interpreted as evidence that MS is not afraid of Sony! Not the other way around. (and btw, Sony built it's first party dev empire before the PS3 generation. Sonyso ain't "quietly building up" anything, not anymore)

That was a terrible blog post.

Studios eat through profit margins.  MS's game division would have an even harder time profitting from quarter to quarter with 1st party studios needing checks for all their employees and supplies.  MS want to compete in price arena.  Their business model is built around that thinking.  Plus, MS still has over $5 billion to $6 billion to make up for.  It's almost certain that MS nor Sony will be able to climb of the hole this console generation.  However, Sony spent all that money to be recouped over, AT LEAST, 2 console generations with Cell and Blu-ray.

Also, Sony isn't "building" the world's largest 1st party.  They've had that title for quite some time now.  It's just becoming even larger.

 



valid points nicely said. However, what is the outcome, what will happen after all that bragging and fear of the competition. My guess both of them will just have to learn to live together. They are already losing both sides so, is more lose is gonna stop them, I dont think so.



PLAYSTATION®3 is the future.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E

Around the Network

'Afraid' is such a strong word is this case... Although otherwise there are quite a few good points.




Xbox 360:

Has a game library that is similar to the PS2

Are you kidding me? The whole market has been westernized, and I can't find a single Japanese exclusive with a 90+ rating on the 360.

Perhaps the PS3 is closer, but even there Japanese efforts have been dissapointing.



I wonder who writes this shit. M$ is afraid of Sony, even to an extent that justifies the massive investments into the business. But the post didn't really go into the reasons.
Surely it's a relief to M$ that Wii is leading the market instead of PS3, but they have next gen to take into consideration, where Sony could disrupt M$. At the moment M$ play the game of "deep pockets", where their aim is to get Sony to bleed as much as possible, since M$ can absorb the costs it creates to itself.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

Because 7 8 9.

Wait, wrong joke...*reads thread properly*



Hmm, pie.

Carl2291 said:
Good article... can agree with a lot of the points made.

Aint there a graph that shows something about at the same point in the consoles lifetime PS3 is like 1.5+ million consoles up? And thats without the pricecut thats sure to come this year.

 

Yes, but this is changing.... wheras Sony's momentum is falling in their 3rd year, the 360's increased substantially in their 4th. The "same point in time" comparison charts will equalize over the next few months.