i wont buy game if its gonna be a step down from call of duty modern warfare 1...

By bending to the will of groups like the PETA? I would say that would be a step backwards for the industry.

The gaming industry should be the bigger person and creating a game like "Vegetarian Mamma"? Even if they do not want to?

Should we have been the bigger person and listened to Jack Thomson and stop making games with violence?

Should be have been the bigger person and made friendly war games? I never knew war was friendly...

Giving in to irrational pressure groups is hardly being the bigger 'person'.

Like i said.... you have to pick your battles...Jack Thompson is an idiot and dosent base his "facts" on anicdodal evidence.... And i see absolutelly nothing wrong with adding more vegiterian dishes to cooking mama that just adds more varitety to the gameplay and does not hurt the gameplay in any way.... neather is removing the dogs from the CoD game....

 being irrational would be to tell the developer to take the games off the shelves.... which from what i can see they are not doing.....

Neither is anything wrong with keeping the dogs in the CoD game. Who the fuck are the PETA to tell me, you or any developer out there what they should or shouldn't do? Last I checked they weren't even an active part of the gaming industry. 

This is just them trying to force their views onto everyone else. As usual...

Here is a good example of just how far these groups go. 

http://www.newsday.com/news/printedition/longisland/ny-lipeta176072241mar17,0,5333870.story

A fucking Elementary School of all places... protesting and stopping children on the way out of school to preach to them about how bad circus' are and how badly they treat animals, knowing that children are by far the easiest ones to feed their bullshit to and successfully force their views on.

When I read that in my Newsday the other day I felt enough was enough. How anyone could support a group like this is beyond my comprehension.

Hmmm there are other games that kills dogs. Maybe PETA should also attack Resident Evil but i guess infected dogs doesnt count lol. Whats next? Pokemon? (who hasnt tried to use their pets to attack upon commanding them lol)

ok first off im gonna go ahead and disregard the second par since it has nothing to do w/ the argument.

Secondly ... i dont see them forsing their vies on anyone... they were just offended by what they saw.... and that was something that can absolutelly be removed in the NEXT CoD without it hurting the gameplay in anyway... why is this such a problem?

Oh come on PETA they aren't real! You might as well protest the extreme cruelty of Pokemon capture/fighting and that horridness that is Monster Hunter.

It has to do with the PETA trying to force  push their views on everything, including trying to do so now with the gaming industry.

Giving and an doing what I bolded would be exactly what I am trying to point out. It would be us giving in to their views on how things should and shouldn't be done. That is what the "problem" is.

Why is a problem to have the dogs in there? Because the PETA doesn't like it? Too bad.