By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - New Sony fee a HUGE loss for PS3 owners --- O RLY?!!

New Sony fee a huge loss for PS3 owners

 

Last week MTV Multiplayer blog alerted us to a disturbing change in the Playstation 3 landscape, and if you're Sony devotee, you should be livid.

As of October 1, 2008, Sony began imposing a "Playstation Network Bandwidth Fee" on all downloadable content. This fee bills game publishers every time a user downloads games, demos, trailers, movies — everything — from the Playstation Network.

Charges run 16 cents per GB of content transferred — whether the content is free or paid, but free content is charged only for the first 60 days of availability on the network.

This appears to be Sony's way of covering massive corporate losses while allowing the network to remain free to users. By contrast, Microsoft charges Xbox Live users $50 a year to connect.

And it's a novel way to go about it. If someone wants to make money on the Playstation Network, why not add a little somethin'-somethin' to help keep the company in business and the service free?

But a bandwidth fee is exactly the wrong way to go about it, and if you own a Playstation 3, you should be mad as hell, because with this ill-conceived move by Sony has all but guaranteed that you'll be sorry you don't own an Xbox 360.

Here's why: A one GB demo downloaded one million times will result in a $160,000 bill from Sony. Sony is very hush-hush when it comes to exactly how many times any of their Playstation Network content is downloaded, but it's safe to assume that, with more than 20 million PSN users worldwide, there's a good chance that most of the big demos and trailers will get at least that much attention.

And publishers are already feeling the pinch of these fees. According to a source quoted in MTV Multiplayer's blog: "“It definitely makes us think about how we view the distribution of content related to our games when it is free for us to do it on the web, on Xbox Live, or any other way — including broadcast — than on Sony’s platform."

This isn't some secretly coded, deeply veiled, idle threat. This is an outright admission that publishers are actually weighing whether they want use PSN instead of some other service — like Xbox Live, which doesn't penalize publishers for putting up popular content.

In other words, Sony has effectively made putting anything on the Playstation Network a no-win situation for publishers.

Put up a big, glorious demo to promote your title? Fine, but it'll cost you a fortune every time someone downloads it. Gimp a demo and shrink the file size? Fine, unless it gets downloaded four million times.

And what value is it to a publisher to put up a beautiful 1080p demo of its amazing game if it can only afford to make it 10 seconds long? Or, worse yet, charge users for the demo?

And that's only if you're a big company that isn't working on a shoestring budget. If you're Q-Games or Southpeak, why offer a demo at all?

But who really gets it in the teeth are rhythm-game fans. With music licensing fees and other associated administrative and development costs of publishing add-on songs for games like Guitar Hero and Rock Band, the profit margin on these songs is very fine. Add in a new fee and you can bet that you'll be seeing that the price of these songs.

By imposing this "bandwidth fee" Sony has effectively turned the PS3 into an exclusive-only console, because if given a choice between two consoles to buy a game — one of which offers you better expansion content for better prices — customers will choose that console.

The only time they will chose otherwise is if they have no other choice but to buy a game for the PS3. And the PS3 doesn’t have enough exclusive titles to keep it afloat in the next year.

And if you're a publisher, Sony has, in one fell swoop, effectively guaranteed that you'll be making your demos, trailers and hefty add-on content exclusive to Xbox Live.

Honestly, Sony would have been better off charging a small amount to consumers, because although it would hear a lot of whining, at least it wouldn't be gimping future content of its online store.

I don't know if Sony will be smart enough to back off of this plan or change the fees so they don't penalize good publishers with good demos. But until it does, I can almost hear the cackling from Redmond.

http://www.examiner.com/x-3674-SF-Video-Game-Examiner~y2009m3d22-New-Sony-fee-a-huge-loss-for-PS3-owners

________________---

The article is VERY MELODRAMATIC

As usual SONY gets bad press for making really not a bad decision!

Sickening I feel!

BUT HEY....the CAT PICTURE IS COOL!

_____________________

_____________________

 



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Around the Network

duplicate thread, you are late to the party darth



Well you pay for quality and it shows with xbox live and not so much with the ps3.



gergroy said:
duplicate thread, you are late to the party darth

 

confirmed



You should be beaten, burned to ashes then someone should throw your ashes from a plane

shhhh

gergroy was paid by M$ to say this!!



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Around the Network
Andrizzle12 said:
Well you pay for quality and it shows with xbox live and not so much with the ps3.

 

Oh would you be quiet?

@ OP, posted three times already.



Regardless.. i'll ssay that what they are doing is good for us games and keeps psn free.. so why the fuck.. no.. How the fuck can people still whine over it ? some people must really not have anything to do.. at all.. damn :\



Check out my game about moles ^

This plan is extremely stupid, if only because they are also charging this fee on free content. The likelihood of demos and free DLC goes way down with this, and it's also likely that publishers will begin removing older products from the PlayStation Store. Accidentally delete the MGS Database? Good luck redownloading it, because Konami just removed it!



I doubt u read the articles u post darth



Oh noes.. this complaint comes from an unofficial developer that stated "Its not cool. It sucks!" Mmmmhmm. This news carries as much wheight as "someone saw wonder woman down town poping steriods!" And for "the source" to use the words "Its not cool. It sucks" says alot.

This in no way carries any burden to the PSN or the PS3.

I'd say, if your THAT unhappy paying that 16cents.. go public and we'll be kind enough not to pay for your DLCs.

And to say that this is a PS3 problem is just fanboyism.