By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Wanted dev praises PS3/360, Wii is a "****ing Genesis" --~-- Do YOU Agree?

1337 Gamer said:
Megadude said:
Look at successful Wii games and judge for yourself. So the Wii is about as powerful as the original X-Box- Is this news or somthing? He has a point though a developer can make a game with pretty high end graphics and know he can have it on PS360.

The Wii shares more titles with Gamecube and PS2 then PS360 there's a reason for that. And so long as Wii owners continue to not support quality titles like Madworld and No More Heros, you can expect the trend to continue.

yeah but is the wii really supporting Madworld and No More heroes? there selling like ASS. In a way i agree with the underlying comments that this dev says but he went a little too far. But for the most part i think we can agree that 3rd part games dont sell well.

 

 

 

Think about the games you're talking about in context, seriously. How well did Suda51 games do before NMH? They were all cult classics that sold terribly. NMH outsold his previous games by a huge amount. And Madworld could do quite well for what it is, we don't know yet.



A game I'm developing with some friends:

www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm

It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.

Around the Network
1337 Gamer said:
Megadude said:
Look at successful Wii games and judge for yourself. So the Wii is about as powerful as the original X-Box- Is this news or somthing? He has a point though a developer can make a game with pretty high end graphics and know he can have it on PS360.

The Wii shares more titles with Gamecube and PS2 then PS360 there's a reason for that. And so long as Wii owners continue to not support quality titles like Madworld and No More Heros, you can expect the trend to continue.

yeah but is the wii really supporting Madworld and No More heroes? there selling like ASS. In a way i agree with the underlying comments that this dev says but he went a little too far. But for the most part i think we can agree that 3rd part games dont sell well.

 

Offcourse they don't. Have you seen the quality of games 3rd party has put out on the Wii? Those that had reasonably good attempts have sold 500K plus.

 

 

 



 

 

I'm a kid?? YAY

Guess the Wii is "the fountain of youth" then....

Damn didn't know Nintendo could be that powerful



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

WereKitten said:
Soriku said:
Megadude said:
I don't think the only point is that "Wii is for little kids and old people". The point is that quality games- third party games particulary- Wii owners are not buying them. So long as Wii fanboys ignore this fact plug up their ears and go "FALALALA! I can't hear you!" Is not helping the case for better games on Wii.

 

You know, I've yet to see some example of quality games that are on the Wii that supposedly didn't sell well that aren't niche in some way. How many big third party games on the Wii actually flopped?

Too vague. Depending on "quality", "well", "niche" and "big" there could be many or none. Same on any other console.

But just for fun: Okami, Tenchu, Tomb Raider, Deadly Creatures out of the top of my head.

@jayderyu

I very much hope there's nothing like a "new thought" to which everybody must conform. It's not like the Wii is pushing the industry forward: it moved sideways.

It's like the movie industry versus television productions: the tv is aimed at a larger demographic, is more accessible and easier to consume, has lower production values and lower quality of presentation. There is great tv series, but the lower threshold also means more crap.

The movie industry went through a panic phase when the tv first started making inroads, in the very same way as some game industry people. But in the same way as movies, big production value games will find their way in parallel with the productions for the widened audience.

Asking the people who always directed movies to drop everything because the tv is the future, because it brings more money or because it has a larger audience is disrespectful and irrealistic. We need good tv and good movies, both can be done and both can be enjoyed. I am strongly against the idea of forcing an uniformity of thought.

This is not what we are asking. We are asking for respect towards our medium of choice. If George Lucas hates making programs for television, so be it. But don't be a little bitch and cry about it when Lost get's more critical praise ánd followers then the latest Star Wars Saga.

 



The Doctor will see you now  Promoting Lesbianism -->

                              

I concur.



Around the Network
irstupid said:
Megadude said:
I don't think the only point is that "Wii is for little kids and old people". The point is that quality games- third party games particulary- Wii owners are not buying them. So long as Wii fanboys ignore this fact plug up their ears and go "FALALALA! I can't hear you!" Is not helping the case for better games on Wii.

 

well sorry that these awesome game (madworld and others) just don't appeal to some people.

 

I see the quality of madworld and hope it sells good over some shitty gingerbread man or others that are a discrase to gaming not due to nature of game but the bugginess and all that is wrong with it.  Who am I to judge if a genre should exist or not.

 

But I'm NOT gonna go out and buy Madworld just so it gets one more $50 sale.  I am turned off on that game because it just doesn't suit my tastes.  It looks like a runningman (movie, arnold swartzenader) type game with a shit ton of blood and pointless killing.  Thats all you do from what i can tell.  Sorry but that just don't interest me, so I'm not going FALALALALA or anything.  Go back to your fucking 50th shooter game and quit stereotyping us wii owners.  and yes i just stereotyped you.

 

 Sterotype me all you want and curse and rip the pubes out of your nutsack for all I care. Guess what I am a Wii owner as well as a PS3 owner so yes I will enjoy my 50th shooter as well as any Wii game I please. Pwned.



Esmoreit said:

This is not what we are asking. We are asking for respect towards our medium of choice. If George Lucas hates making programs for television, so be it. But don't be a little bitch and cry about it when Lost get's more critical praise ánd followers then the latest Star Wars Saga.

 

Maybe that's not what you are asking.

But how many times have we read comments on the lines of "those producers are so stupid... instead of doing that game for the HD consoles they should have done two for the Wii and they would have costed half as much" and "I'm glad if the economic downturn will push them to make simpler games".

Btw, I think having a "medium of choice" is restrictive. I like good books, good tv, good comics and good movies.

There are great Wii games. I don't see why every developer that doesn't want to go the Wii way, should. Maybe they find it resrictive for the wrong reasons, maybe they are being elitists. Who cares? The Wii has its Joss Whedons, stop asking every movie director to start working on tv... most of them wouldn't be good at it anyway.



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman

WereKitten said:
Esmoreit said:
 

This is not what we are asking. We are asking for respect towards our medium of choice. If George Lucas hates making programs for television, so be it. But don't be a little bitch and cry about it when Lost get's more critical praise ánd followers then the latest Star Wars Saga.

 

Maybe that's not what you are asking.

But how many times have we read comments on the lines of "those producers are so stupid... instead of doing that game for the HD consoles they should have done two for the Wii and they would have costed half as much" and "I'm glad if the economic downturn will push them to make simpler games".

Btw, I think having a "medium of choice" is restrictive. I like good books, good tv, good comics and good movies.

There are great Wii games. I don't see why every developer that doesn't want to go the Wii way, should. Maybe they find it resrictive for the wrong reasons, maybe they are being elitists. Who cares? The Wii has its Joss Whedons, stop asking every movie director to start working on tv... most of them wouldn't be good at it anyway.

I should have said one of our mediums of choice. I too enjoy a wide variety of media from books to films to videogames. Hell, I even enjoy playing HD videogames. Wanated himself is creating this dichotomy between the Wii and HD consoles, clearly marking his territory to one medium of choice. That's fine, at least to me, but at least word it right, and with proper arguements as his claims have been debunked over and over already.

As for the comments you stated on wii development... that is some users. Generalizations go both ways. I think that a dev should do what he likes. BUT - to some dev's with less resources spreading a risk can be more helpfull.

 



The Doctor will see you now  Promoting Lesbianism -->

                              

WereKitten said:

@jayderyu

I very much hope there's nothing like a "new thought" to which everybody must conform. It's not like the Wii is pushing the industry forward: it moved sideways.

It's like the movie industry versus television productions: the tv is aimed at a larger demographic, is more accessible and easier to consume, has lower production values and lower quality of presentation. There is great tv series, but the lower threshold also means more crap.

The movie industry went through a panic phase when the tv first started making inroads, in the very same way as some game industry people. But in the same way as movies, big production value games will find their way in parallel with the productions for the widened audience.

Asking the people who always directed movies to drop everything because the tv is the future, because it brings more money or because it has a larger audience is disrespectful and irrealistic. We need good tv and good movies, both can be done and both can be enjoyed. I am strongly against the idea of forcing an uniformity of thought.

I don't think you get what a paradigm shift is then. Paradigm shifts aren't evolution, but a complete shift in thought. A move sideways is accurate to a paradigm shift. It's just that the new path will go farther and stronger while the other will continue on the path.

Second I think you might have missed the meaning of the "move sideways". It's not in relation to what games are produced, but in relation on how to sell the same games to the bigger market.

I'm aware of applying the Hollywood model to gaming. It's not entirely accurate though in it's use in regards to my written post. I'm not talking about how Howholly wood makes movies. I'm more referring to the Theatres that shows the movies and how it relates. In Canada here our 2 biggest movie franchises have had serious problems. Cineplex Odion and Famous Players. Odion wen down first having to pull back and restructure due to how the Movie industry made movies and seemed to up the cost of playing feel? Famous Players went along the same traditional values. Bigger and Better. So they made the Silver Cities, but you ended up paying more per movie. They believed that it was more worth it so they past the costs down the to customer. Well by the end of the day both companies were bought out by a us company.

The Theaters rather than finding an established way to present the movies to the customers to make a better profit ended up losing out on personal control. The new owners dropped prices and continued to let older thaters to continue running rather than forcing the still increased price.

Two things could have helped our ailing movie houses. Lower Holywood rental fees or a different business model to attract more viewers earlier. If a new model was found ALL movie theaters would have seen the better results and gotten on board to continue on healthy. This would be akin to a paradigm shift in the way of thinking on how movies need to be presented to the customers.

While we often kind the Wii to TV model and HD Console to Movie model. It's not that accurate in how it's often used. It would be more accurate to judge that the HD Console is more akin to Made for TV Movies and many Wii games to TV shows. Arcades are more like their Hollywood counterpart. 

So if home console is the TV and Arcade is Hollywood. Why is Hollywood movies still around. Simple because Hollywood and Theaters can provide that TV can't and for some years never will. Big screen experience with full surround loud sound. When it comes to consoles however the mass of gamers out their, even the old ones(I mean ALL gamers including PC, handheld...) place lower value on the graphics than game play. They also value fun games more than graphical games. And they also value easy versatile input(pointer) over limited input like joysticks. So their is an inevitablity that the home game model(wii) will once again beat out the arcade model(HD console). Will their be an end. Of course not. Newtonian Law still applies, it's just now a smaller subset. Much like the Arcade is now the smaller experience of the electronic gamers.

It's not the games we play that will change. It's how we play them. Physics hasn't changed, just how we apply them.

 



Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.

WereKitten said:
Soriku said:
Megadude said:
I don't think the only point is that "Wii is for little kids and old people". The point is that quality games- third party games particulary- Wii owners are not buying them. So long as Wii fanboys ignore this fact plug up their ears and go "FALALALA! I can't hear you!" Is not helping the case for better games on Wii.

 

You know, I've yet to see some example of quality games that are on the Wii that supposedly didn't sell well that aren't niche in some way. How many big third party games on the Wii actually flopped?

Too vague. Depending on "quality", "well", "niche" and "big" there could be many or none. Same on any other console.

But just for fun: Okami, Tenchu, Tomb Raider, Deadly Creatures out of the top of my head.

@jayderyu

I very much hope there's nothing like a "new thought" to which everybody must conform. It's not like the Wii is pushing the industry forward: it moved sideways.

It's like the movie industry versus television productions: the tv is aimed at a larger demographic, is more accessible and easier to consume, has lower production values and lower quality of presentation. There is great tv series, but the lower threshold also means more crap.

The movie industry went through a panic phase when the tv first started making inroads, in the very same way as some game industry people. But in the same way as movies, big production value games will find their way in parallel with the productions for the widened audience.

Asking the people who always directed movies to drop everything because the tv is the future, because it brings more money or because it has a larger audience is disrespectful and irrealistic. We need good tv and good movies, both can be done and both can be enjoyed. I am strongly against the idea of forcing an uniformity of thought.

 

Tomb Raider? come on man >.>; That game has long lost it's touch outside of Europe, and Okami is probably too Eastern for a lot of people as to something like Zelda: TP, not to mention it was also on the PS2, the other 2 though, I do hope they sell better because Tenchu 4 is silly fun(but there is also a PSP version sigh) while Deadly Creatures is just a very unique game with a reasonable price tag( though a lot of people hate bugs so they probably won't pick it up, not house wives at least....)