naznatips said:
I agree to an extent that there are always people who will like a game, regardless of reviews, but that doesn't mean you should attack every review source known to man... I don't know of any Red Steel players who disagree with the reviews or attack the sources. They just say that they like the game regardless. The point of the article is that people should praise reviewers for being honest enough to review a big game low, rather than attack them for it. |
I agree with that. I wish they'd do it more often. There are plenty of games I love that get low ratings but I don't attack the reviewers because of it. (Aside from statistically proven bias.)
For example Colosseum: Road to Freedom is an amazing fun addictive game. It has a Metacritic review score of 56. Which according to some people is analagous to punching a baby. Not only that but i can actually see alot of the flaws in the game and know why it could get a low review. It still doesn't lessen my enjoyment of it and i'd still suggest it to anybody i know who's looking for a good simple game you can pick up anytime.
There are precious and few gaming moments on the 50+ PS2 games I have that are more fun then beating down some heavily armored gladiators with my characters bare hands in the striker stance.
There is a big difference between attacking reviews and calling people bias fanboys when the stats show the opposite or saying things like well they must just suck at playing games (Like it's possible to suck at games and be a game reviewer.) and just saying "I disagree, despite it's flaws I find it very enjoyable."












