you tricked me!

No he didn't but putting the entire phrase in the title wouldnt fit, agree? Besides, you are the only person I see that has any problems with it. Anyways if people read the article and my thoughts at the end of it, they could easily tell I'm not trolling, but rather posting info on how Activision saw the Wii and that most complaints about their games were valid.

I said I reworded it, same was posted on another gaming forum and no one complained. I should have better posted the entire link with title and all...

Misleading topic titles are against the rules, and 90% of the time you make a thread with that wort of title, fanboys will flock in to bash people without reading the OP... and you "reworded" horribly.

I didn't. He is clearly SAYING that with softer words because he is probably talking to shareholders in that PR talk.

"In the past we approached the Wii as an extension of what we were doing on PlayStation and the Xbox "

What does that mean then?

Quick, someone explain this to me:

"we can do a better job of creating original content for the Wii, and I think you'll see more of that this year."

Activision plans to launch three franchises in 2009, the first-person shooter game "Singularity," the action game "Prototype" and a still-to-be named racing game.

If Activision is only launching three franchises in 2009 - all on HD, then what 'original' content are they bringing to Wii??

Misleading thread title, locking.

"we were trying to put similar games on Wii without designing from the ground up" which isn't a second thought it's trying to make a similar game when the Wii isn't the PS2 like last gen the power gap is bigger so you need to build from the ground up.

I honestly don't know. It could mean they are going to launch more GH without delays and that maybe some other older franchises like CoD will make it. But I agree that at least those 2 new franchises are HD only, so I was wondering the same.