By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Have 360 fanboys become worse on this site?

windbane said:
starcraft said:

The single biggest issue that pervades PS3 supporters on this site is their constant and unswerving belief year after year that they have an unbeatable game line-up, that is then inevitably beaten.

Seriously, dude? In a thread where the topic is that 360 fanboys are going too far lately, a point to which I agree with, you have to go and say that?

85% rated games on metacritic in 2008...who had the most? PS3. It's very close, and if you change the number it is the 360 depending on which number you pick. The point is that both systems have great games and which system has better games is subjective and not an objective fact.

So even if PS3 fanboys annoyingly proclaim that the PS3 lineup is far superior, you can't say that it is "inevitably beaten" because that makes you as bad as them.

You my friend, are something of a contradiction.  If indeed a system having better games is a subjective fact as you say, then I can easily and honestly say that assertions that the PS3 lineup is far superior will be inevitably beaten, unless you are arguing that every gamer on Earth would subjectively choose it's lineup over any other?

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Around the Network

Those who lack self-confidence attacks others with bad and childish arguments.



windbane said:
starcraft said:

The single biggest issue that pervades PS3 supporters on this site is their constant and unswerving belief year after year that they have an unbeatable game line-up, that is then inevitably beaten.

Seriously, dude? In a thread where the topic is that 360 fanboys are going too far lately, a point to which I agree with, you have to go and say that?

85% rated games on metacritic in 2008...who had the most? PS3. It's very close, and if you change the number it is the 360 depending on which number you pick. The point is that both systems have great games and which system has better games is subjective and not an objective fact.

So even if PS3 fanboys annoyingly proclaim that the PS3 lineup is far superior, you can't say that it is "inevitably beaten" because that makes you as bad as them.

 

I didn't even realise that. How ironic. Complaining that ps3 fanboys claim they have the best lineup and then saying that the 360 in which you favor beats their lineup every year in the same breath. :P

 




PS3 Trophies

 

 

no



Solid_Raiden said:
windbane said:
starcraft said:

The single biggest issue that pervades PS3 supporters on this site is their constant and unswerving belief year after year that they have an unbeatable game line-up, that is then inevitably beaten.

Seriously, dude? In a thread where the topic is that 360 fanboys are going too far lately, a point to which I agree with, you have to go and say that?

85% rated games on metacritic in 2008...who had the most? PS3. It's very close, and if you change the number it is the 360 depending on which number you pick. The point is that both systems have great games and which system has better games is subjective and not an objective fact.

So even if PS3 fanboys annoyingly proclaim that the PS3 lineup is far superior, you can't say that it is "inevitably beaten" because that makes you as bad as them.

I didn't even realise that. How ironic. Complaining that ps3 fanboys claim they have the best lineup and then saying that the 360 in which you favor beats their lineup every year in the same breath. :P

It's funny.  I don't see a single point in that post where I have said the Xbox 330 beats the PS3 line-up every year...

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Around the Network
starcraft said:
windbane said:
starcraft said:

The single biggest issue that pervades PS3 supporters on this site is their constant and unswerving belief year after year that they have an unbeatable game line-up, that is then inevitably beaten.

Seriously, dude? In a thread where the topic is that 360 fanboys are going too far lately, a point to which I agree with, you have to go and say that?

85% rated games on metacritic in 2008...who had the most? PS3. It's very close, and if you change the number it is the 360 depending on which number you pick. The point is that both systems have great games and which system has better games is subjective and not an objective fact.

So even if PS3 fanboys annoyingly proclaim that the PS3 lineup is far superior, you can't say that it is "inevitably beaten" because that makes you as bad as them.

You my friend, are something of a contradiction. If indeed a system having better games is a subjective fact as you say, then I can easily and honestly say that assertions that the PS3 lineup is far superior will be inevitably beaten, unless you are arguing that every gamer on Earth would subjectively choose it's lineup over any other?

 

 



starcraft said:
Solid_Raiden said:
windbane said:
starcraft said:

The single biggest issue that pervades PS3 supporters on this site is their constant and unswerving belief year after year that they have an unbeatable game line-up, that is then inevitably beaten.

Seriously, dude? In a thread where the topic is that 360 fanboys are going too far lately, a point to which I agree with, you have to go and say that?

85% rated games on metacritic in 2008...who had the most? PS3. It's very close, and if you change the number it is the 360 depending on which number you pick. The point is that both systems have great games and which system has better games is subjective and not an objective fact.

So even if PS3 fanboys annoyingly proclaim that the PS3 lineup is far superior, you can't say that it is "inevitably beaten" because that makes you as bad as them.

I didn't even realise that. How ironic. Complaining that ps3 fanboys claim they have the best lineup and then saying that the 360 in which you favor beats their lineup every year in the same breath. :P

It's funny.  I don't see a single point in that post where I have said the Xbox 330 beats the PS3 line-up every year...

 

Then what does it mean exactly when you say the ps3 lineup is praised to be superior to the 360's each year only for it to be beaten. Not equalled. No mention of both systems having equalled lineups each year, but beaten.

 




PS3 Trophies

 

 

starcraft said:
Solid_Raiden said:
windbane said:
starcraft said:

The single biggest issue that pervades PS3 supporters on this site is their constant and unswerving belief year after year that they have an unbeatable game line-up, that is then inevitably beaten.

Seriously, dude? In a thread where the topic is that 360 fanboys are going too far lately, a point to which I agree with, you have to go and say that?

85% rated games on metacritic in 2008...who had the most? PS3. It's very close, and if you change the number it is the 360 depending on which number you pick. The point is that both systems have great games and which system has better games is subjective and not an objective fact.

So even if PS3 fanboys annoyingly proclaim that the PS3 lineup is far superior, you can't say that it is "inevitably beaten" because that makes you as bad as them.

I didn't even realise that. How ironic. Complaining that ps3 fanboys claim they have the best lineup and then saying that the 360 in which you favor beats their lineup every year in the same breath. :P

It's funny. I don't see a single point in that post where I have said the Xbox 330 beats the PS3 line-up every year...

 

It's funny. It's the bolded part that you quoted. It's stated as fact, which it isn't.



Solid_Raiden said:
starcraft said:
Solid_Raiden said:
windbane said:
starcraft said:

The single biggest issue that pervades PS3 supporters on this site is their constant and unswerving belief year after year that they have an unbeatable game line-up, that is then inevitably beaten.

Seriously, dude? In a thread where the topic is that 360 fanboys are going too far lately, a point to which I agree with, you have to go and say that?

85% rated games on metacritic in 2008...who had the most? PS3. It's very close, and if you change the number it is the 360 depending on which number you pick. The point is that both systems have great games and which system has better games is subjective and not an objective fact.

So even if PS3 fanboys annoyingly proclaim that the PS3 lineup is far superior, you can't say that it is "inevitably beaten" because that makes you as bad as them.

I didn't even realise that. How ironic. Complaining that ps3 fanboys claim they have the best lineup and then saying that the 360 in which you favor beats their lineup every year in the same breath. :P

It's funny.  I don't see a single point in that post where I have said the Xbox 330 beats the PS3 line-up every year...

Then what does it mean exactly when you say the ps3 lineup is praised to be superior to the 360's each year only for it to be beaten. Not equalled. No mention of both systems having equalled lineups each year, but beaten.

I can see where I mentioned the PS3.

Again, where did I mention the Xbox 360?

Are you arguing that the PS3's lineup IS "unbeatable" every year?

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Possibly. This is the worst fanboy site I know of. I just try to ignore them.