They say it's from a reliable source and not Vgchartz.... LOL http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=183462 Interesting coincidence.. Vgchartz makes the announcement and then they come up with the same conclusion a couple days later??

NeoGafs Numbers
Wii Total - 10.36
360 Total - 10.20

Vgchartz Numbers
Wii Total - 10.57
360 Total - 10.51

Total Difference
Wii - 0.21 / 2%
360 - 0.31 / 3%

Way to go NeoGaf!! Hypocritical bastards.. You're numbers are basically the same as Vgchartz yet you refuse to acknowledge them.

Acknowledgement means admitting someone else might be more right than you! Its a hard thing to ask of anyone, loller

Good god that site is 360 biased. Seriously read the first couple pages.

Not trying to bash us here, but why are they "copying" us? You have no proof. They could have taken all the other media outlets and just added them all together. They aren't necessarily basing it on our numbers.

Interesting. NeoGAF's party line is that VGChartz is "inaccurate" and "unreliable," yet their numbers are almost dentical to those here. What does that make them?

@Rendo I think the point is that our estimates are well within acceptable margins of error of their estimates....and yet they claim VGC is inaccurate and unreliable....

Hopefully it's obvious that what they are saying makes no sense.

They actually used the phrase "VG Chartz" in that post. That shocked the living crap out of me; last I checked VG Chartz would get stared out of posts people would make.

The only thing GAF is good for is gifs.  They have some really talented gif makers over there...

Ah! That's awesome