By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Who probably spent their $50 million better: Microsoft or Sony?

BxN said:
gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

More like:

KZ campaign:

9 to 12 hours

 

KZ multiplayer:

hundreds of hours.

 

 

Sony wins.

 

Really? You plan on playing KZ2 for hundreds of hours? Ugh. Good luck with that.



Around the Network
dhummel said:
BxN said:
gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

More like:

KZ campaign:

9 to 12 hours

 

KZ multiplayer:

hundreds of hours.

 

 

Sony wins.

 

Really? You plan on playing KZ2 for hundreds of hours? Ugh. Good luck with that.

 

 I don't remember but didn't Rockstar announce that Lost and Damned came with its own MP?

Anyways, got to go.. I'll check up on this later if no one else as looked it up, I'm a little curious about it!



Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

                   

gebx said:
papflesje said:
gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

Oh FFS.

Stop lying :-/

Every review so far that has mentioned a time on KZ's singleplayer campaign has said 10 hours.  You just randomly cut several hours out :-/

And on topic: Kitler is right.  Both investments, both will probably get return on their investment.

I'm really good at FPS's!

Guerrila games mentioned that its roughly 10 hours, but the short length is one of the few complaints brought up against the game.. but that doesn't matter, I'll edit it to 10 hours.. wouldn't want anyone to start to cry!

so the few complaints must be brought up in every fps because 10 hours is average for a fps single player eh

 



dhummel said:
BxN said:
gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

More like:

KZ campaign:

9 to 12 hours

 

KZ multiplayer:

hundreds of hours.

 

 

Sony wins.

 

Really? You plan on playing KZ2 for hundreds of hours? Ugh. Good luck with that.

 

i have clocked in 10 days 9 hours on cod4 that is roughly 249 hours. so yes i plan on playing kz2 for hundreds of hours.



@gebx

You still fail to mention KZ2 multiplayer.

How many FPS you play that have more than an 8-10 hour campaign?

Your really trying much too hard.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Around the Network

what i like about MS is they are trying new stuff, i don't remember a dlc game being so big.
Who knows which game will be more lucrative, but why cant both be a good decision. And trust me if Sony had the money they would have payed for the DLC too.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
gebx said:
dhummel said:
BxN said:
gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

More like:

KZ campaign:

9 to 12 hours

 

KZ multiplayer:

hundreds of hours.

 

 

Sony wins.

 

Really? You plan on playing KZ2 for hundreds of hours? Ugh. Good luck with that.

 

 I don't remember but didn't Rockstar announce that Lost and Damned came with its own MP?

Anyways, got to go.. I'll check up on this later if no one else as looked it up, I'm a little curious about it!

 

indeed i think it does. but regardless i dont think any gta multiplayer will be good enough to compete with a fps



psrock said:
what i like about MS is they are trying new stuff, i don't remember a dlc game being so big.
Who knows which game will be more lucrative, but why cant both be a good decision. And trust me if Sony had the money they would have payed for the DLC too.

 

really if ms didnt pay for it and rockstarr wanted to i think the dlc would of came on both systems, no money was really needed. i doubt the dlc will be as big as people want it to be. but whatever floats your boat, so regardless if you choose kz2 or the dlc your a winner.



dhummel said:
BxN said:
gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

More like:

KZ campaign:

9 to 12 hours

 

KZ multiplayer:

hundreds of hours.

 

 

Sony wins.

 

Really? You plan on playing KZ2 for hundreds of hours? Ugh. Good luck with that.

RSV - 150 hours

RSV2 - 95 hours

CoD4 - 250 hours...

i plan on getting a lot of gametime from this game so yeh... IMO a new game >>>>>> expation to a game i played...and got tired of a year ago

 



gebx said:
dhummel said:
BxN said:
gebx said:
Sony - $50 million
KZ2 campaign - 6 to 8 hours

MS - $50 million
L&D Campaign - 10 to 12 hours
Expension #2 - ??


As a gamer I would say MS!!!

 

More like:

KZ campaign:

9 to 12 hours

 

KZ multiplayer:

hundreds of hours.

 

 

Sony wins.

 

Really? You plan on playing KZ2 for hundreds of hours? Ugh. Good luck with that.

 

 I don't remember but didn't Rockstar announce that Lost and Damned came with its own MP?

Anyways, got to go.. I'll check up on this later if no one else as looked it up, I'm a little curious about it!

calling KZ2 a 9-12 hour game is a distortion of the facts, you know it's a distortion of the facts and that makes you a fucking idiot.  the only one crying here is your mother having to know she raised such a huge failure.