By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - EDGE hammers Killzone 2 - 7.0

Lurker on 07 February 2009
dbot said:
Nice fanboy title " EDGE hammers Killzone 2 - 7.0". Edge gave Halo Wars the exact same score. Maybe it should be EDGE hammers Killzone 2 AND Halo Wars - 7.0

I guess Halo Wars isn't really hyped. /sarcasm

 

Halo wars isn't hyped at all. It's a console RTS, it's not expected to get 9's and 10's.



Around the Network
SpartanFX on 07 February 2009

luker is very upset he doesn't own a PS3.it's ok man ;)


tap tap babeizzzz better than killzone 2 confirmedddd!!!!11111!!!111 XD lool

 

 

BTW they gave fallout 3 a 7 .A game that has won many many GOTY awards,,,So i hope KZ2 endsup in the same boat.



 

 

 

dbot on 07 February 2009

^ Halo Wars is underhyped? You guys have to be kidding me. Have you read the PS3 is desperately in search of a Halo Wars killer threads? What about the Halo Wars will outsell Killzone 2 thread?

Halo Wars and Killzone 2 are both hyped. You can make an argument that Killzone 2 is more hyped, and I would agree with you. But to gloss over the fact that edge gave Halo Wars the exact same score in the same issue as Killzone 2 is disingenuous at best. Please stop believing that 360 fan are any different than fans of other systems.



Thanks for the input, Jeff.

 

 

Zkuq on 07 February 2009
Barozi said:
Well I'm happy for Halo Wars, but the score for Killzone 2 is probably a bit low.

But they gave Fallout 3 a 7 as well......... (douche bags)

Hey, maybe I can take them seriously after all! Most games get too high scores from other reviewers anyway so Edge could simply by harsh. I still can't accept Halo 3 or GeoW1/2 getting such high scores, though, but then again, I have yet to play them. At least the first Halo didn't seem that good.



Lolcislaw on 07 February 2009

its only a review , nothing important and nothing big just like other reviews. Gamers should really concentrate more on gaming then arguing about some magazine giving their most hyped game low score.

At the end of the day also not everyone must like games like MGS4 or Killzone 2



Around the Network
fulcizombie on 07 February 2009
KBG29 said:
This magazine is on the same level as the SDF in my opinion. They just pump out rediculous content, and try to grab views off pure unprofesionalism. If they were supposed to be a joke like SDF I would have less of an issue, but considering that they are positioned as a profesional outfit, this is just embarrasing.

To people trying to defend this. These people are supposed to be professionals. As a professional you are basing your review on how good something is, and not how good it is IYO. A professional food critic does not walk into a resterant that he hates, get served by a shity waiter, down one of the best meals in his life, and still say garbage. He would say that the food is great, his personal taste did not like the resterant or its employees, plus a few examples. In the end if the food is 10 quality the resterant should get a ten, because that is what you are there for. For a game it should only be about how playable the game is, and if there are any game breaking glitches. Otherwise, graphics, story, lastability, sound, and presintation are all subject to personal preferance.

To the person that says they have gameplay preferances....lots of bad stuff.......a game either has good gameplay, or it doesn't. It may be to easy, or it may be to hard, but trhat is not the fualt of the controls, it is either a lack of skill on the players part, or a matter of opinion on how difficault the game is.

This is the most retarded thing that i've ever read in these forums . Edge magazine is, and always has been , the only videogames' magazine worth reading .

SpartanFX on 07 February 2009
fulcizombie said:
KBG29 said:
This magazine is on the same level as the SDF in my opinion. They just pump out rediculous content, and try to grab views off pure unprofesionalism. If they were supposed to be a joke like SDF I would have less of an issue, but considering that they are positioned as a profesional outfit, this is just embarrasing.

To people trying to defend this. These people are supposed to be professionals. As a professional you are basing your review on how good something is, and not how good it is IYO. A professional food critic does not walk into a resterant that he hates, get served by a shity waiter, down one of the best meals in his life, and still say garbage. He would say that the food is great, his personal taste did not like the resterant or its employees, plus a few examples. In the end if the food is 10 quality the resterant should get a ten, because that is what you are there for. For a game it should only be about how playable the game is, and if there are any game breaking glitches. Otherwise, graphics, story, lastability, sound, and presintation are all subject to personal preferance.

To the person that says they have gameplay preferances....lots of bad stuff.......a game either has good gameplay, or it doesn't. It may be to easy, or it may be to hard, but trhat is not the fualt of the controls, it is either a lack of skill on the players part, or a matter of opinion on how difficault the game is.

 

This is the most retarded thing that i've ever read in these forums . Edge magazine is, and always has been , the only videogames' magazine worth reading .

 

According to your "trusted magazine"dance dance babiezz is the best game that's coming out next month.Please buy it and enjoy ;)



 

 

 

blazinhead89 on 07 February 2009
SpartanFX said:
fulcizombie said:
KBG29 said:
This magazine is on the same level as the SDF in my opinion. They just pump out rediculous content, and try to grab views off pure unprofesionalism. If they were supposed to be a joke like SDF I would have less of an issue, but considering that they are positioned as a profesional outfit, this is just embarrasing.

To people trying to defend this. These people are supposed to be professionals. As a professional you are basing your review on how good something is, and not how good it is IYO. A professional food critic does not walk into a resterant that he hates, get served by a shity waiter, down one of the best meals in his life, and still say garbage. He would say that the food is great, his personal taste did not like the resterant or its employees, plus a few examples. In the end if the food is 10 quality the resterant should get a ten, because that is what you are there for. For a game it should only be about how playable the game is, and if there are any game breaking glitches. Otherwise, graphics, story, lastability, sound, and presintation are all subject to personal preferance.

To the person that says they have gameplay preferances....lots of bad stuff.......a game either has good gameplay, or it doesn't. It may be to easy, or it may be to hard, but trhat is not the fualt of the controls, it is either a lack of skill on the players part, or a matter of opinion on how difficault the game is.

 

This is the most retarded thing that i've ever read in these forums . Edge magazine is, and always has been , the only videogames' magazine worth reading .

 

According to your "trusted magazine"dance dance babiezz is the best game that's coming out next month.Please buy it and enjoy ;)


Rofl xD

Kasz216 on 07 February 2009

7.0 is hammering?



luisgvm on 07 February 2009

this is the first review under 8?