By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Fallout 3 dev says Wii is a toy (but Bethesda making medieval Wii games?)

He has a point about the HD consoles. The 360 and PS3 are viewed in a completely different way as the Wii.



Around the Network

Wii demand Bethesda serve us. They owe us due to the Nintendominance. I have that Star Trek Conquest game for the Wii. I supported these people by buying this stinky game... gave them my very lifeblood. Now? They run out and call my Wii not worthy of their greatness.

Now I turn my back on them! The scum. Beer will not betray me like Bethesda has!



 

He didn't say he thought those systems are kill fests. he said most people think that way.



HappySqurriel said:
Sharky54 said:
The way they refer to the Wii, tells me they don't like it. Did you not get that also?

 

Well, there is no "They" in the article being that it is an interview with one man ... This man also happens to own a Wii and is enjoying playing World of Goo on it so I'm not sure if I would say he "doesn't like it"

From what I read, it sounded like an interview where he was asked leading questions, his answers were cherry-picked and taken out of context to create controversy where there really isn't any, and people (like you) are reading too much into this to support your own biases.

Couldn't he be playing World of Goo on PC?

 



BeTa77 said:
Bethesda just doesn't like the Wii. but most of there games are way to BIG for the Wii to handle.

 

I agree, the Wii's 9.4 gb of disc space is less than the 8 gb available on a 360 disc



Around the Network
scottie said:
BeTa77 said:
Bethesda just doesn't like the Wii. but most of there games are way to BIG for the Wii to handle.

 

I agree, the Wii's 9.4 gb of disc space is less than the 8 gb available on a 360 disc

I learn a lot from the Wii knowers.  Who knew X360 was so crippled?  Thanks for the infos scottie.

 



 

Procrastinato said:
scottie said:
BeTa77 said:
Bethesda just doesn't like the Wii. but most of there games are way to BIG for the Wii to handle.

 

I agree, the Wii's 9.4 gb of disc space is less than the 8 gb available on a 360 disc

I learn a lot from the Wii knowers.  Who knew X360 was so crippled?  Thanks for the infos scottie.

 

I think they are both 9 GBs

 

Anyway, its not the amount of info, its the size of the gameworld. If you have played fallout3 you know that you can see certain buildings from the other side of the map(this is the size of a city). The Wii cannot handle that at high graphical settigs.

 



scottie said:
BeTa77 said:
Bethesda just doesn't like the Wii. but most of there games are way to BIG for the Wii to handle.

I agree, the Wii's 9.4 gb of disc space is less than the 8 gb available on a 360 disc

 

I don't think he meant "too big".

Clearly, BIG is some sort of acronym, hence, "to BIG". Acronym usually appears as all caps in the middle of the sentence.

So, what's BIG stands for?



BIG = Badass Industrychanging Giant?



Sharky54 said:

I think they are both 9 GBs

 

Anyway, its not the amount of info, its the size of the gameworld. If you have played fallout3 you know that you can see certain buildings from the other side of the map(this is the size of a city). The Wii cannot handle that at high graphical settigs.

 

 Coreect and incorrect at the same time. Microsoft reserves a rather large amount of space for their DRM and such not. I don't have hard numbers on the Wii disc, but it is my understanding that it requires for less space for it. Of course that is hard to compare since only one Wii game has ever had to be dual layered.

BIG = Badass Industrychanging Giant?

 No that can't be right. Wii Sports was a launch title for the Wii and has done more to change the industry than any other game released in the last 2 generations.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229