Strategyking92 on 02 February 2009
64 vs 64 player battles.... That's just fucking cool right there, though.
Weapon upgrades kept you playing, made it easier to be good if you had been playing for awhile. Don't forget also, that you have seperate squads, and even a commander that does airstrikes and such for you. I wouldn't even fucking compare it to a "modern, streamlined fps" Which I think you are referencing COD4. Skill wasn't just your kill percentage, but it was also how you worked together with your squad.
Not shitty, just different. Maybe you just weren't good at it?
And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.
Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive