By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Strategyking92 said:
64 vs 64 player battles.... That's just fucking cool right there, though.
Weapon upgrades kept you playing, made it easier to be good if you had been playing for awhile. Don't forget also, that you have seperate squads, and even a commander that does airstrikes and such for you. I wouldn't even fucking compare it to a "modern, streamlined fps" Which I think you are referencing COD4. Skill wasn't just your kill percentage, but it was also how you worked together with your squad.
Not shitty, just different. Maybe you just weren't good at it?

 

Oh I was quite proficient in shooting people in the back while other peeps were shooting them at the front. I felt horrible given the fact that all I did was just press a fucking button and got lucky I was behind them. Games like BF completely ruined MP FPS games.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835