By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - KZ2 & RE5 grfx comparison - Yet another victory for the Helghan Masterpiece

They picked some poor pics of KZ2 tbh.

No question that KZ2 looks better.

Though I do like the face of RE5's main dude. Looks good.



Around the Network
BengaBenga said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
NJ5 said:
Oh, an exclusive game with focus on graphics trumps a multi-platform game in the graphical area!

How surprising...

Agreed its silly lol.

And @Benga- Just my opinion on the subject. i dont ever see the wii getting close to the HD consoles in the graphics area, not by a longshot, not even early games like Halo 3 or Folklore.

Just sayin in terms of beauty Fragile = Best in Graphics for the wii atm.

Overall with games like that one "King" game, its obvious most devs could careless about the wiis graphics and more about its innovation.

The one true game thats exclusive to the wii that could take the throne as Number one imo is MH3 in terms of graphics.

 

 

Don't make up things.
No one said Wii would come close to the HD consoles
. And you said (quote) Fragile = Wii's maximum IMO which is just silly.

Devs only recently have started to realize that in order to maximize profits they have to take the Wii seriously, and every other week there's an article about how surprising it is that core games actually sell and that core Wii gamers expect great graphics as well. Not the HD quality graphics, but relative to the power of the system. That's why people like efforts like Fragile, Monster Hunter, MadWorld and the Conduit. Not that they can stand up to Killzone, but because the quality of the graphics are great FOR WII, which means the developer put effort in the game (which will likely mean a good game).

Graphics like the afforementioned games are just the beginning. Again, not saying these will ever come close to a Killzone, but I'm sure we'll see awesome looking stuff on Wii.

I can only imagine what a real Wii Zelda will look like, since Twilight Princess looked great imo and was a GC game.

Not on VGChartz they havent, but i've been to IGN and GameFAQ's and i've heared comments such as "Wii's Graphics will overshadow the 360 pretty soon and PS3 soon to follow" so with that quote in mind there are those who are delusional enough to believe such obvious BS.

Wasn't pointing out anyone here, but i have heared it.

At anyrate im not sure about that Twilight because it was Multi-plat after all.

I know what you're getting at though, graphics can only get better obviously, but not to much to the point where in can even put a dent into the PS3 or X360.

I'd place a Bet though MH3 > All on wii. it looks beautiful on PSP thats why capcom did well on that franchise.

 



after second batch of killzone 2 pics:

 



 

 

 

SpartanFX said:

after second batch of killzone 2 pics:

 

lulz!

 



@seraphic

ACTUALLY on Vg Chartz things like this HAVE been said

there was a huge EPIC thread a while ago claiming COD 4 grfx are capable on the wii (the OP was confident)

if people take crazzyman's predictions seriously & bash a game's sales upon those....I'm sure that thread can be counted as such discussions having been taken place on vg chartz



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Around the Network
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
BengaBenga said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:

Agreed its silly lol.

And @Benga- Just my opinion on the subject. i dont ever see the wii getting close to the HD consoles in the graphics area, not by a longshot, not even early games like Halo 3 or Folklore.

Just sayin in terms of beauty Fragile = Best in Graphics for the wii atm.

Overall with games like that one "King" game, its obvious most devs could careless about the wiis graphics and more about its innovation.

The one true game thats exclusive to the wii that could take the throne as Number one imo is MH3 in terms of graphics.

 

 

Don't make up things.
No one said Wii would come close to the HD consoles
. And you said (quote) Fragile = Wii's maximum IMO which is just silly.

Devs only recently have started to realize that in order to maximize profits they have to take the Wii seriously, and every other week there's an article about how surprising it is that core games actually sell and that core Wii gamers expect great graphics as well. Not the HD quality graphics, but relative to the power of the system. That's why people like efforts like Fragile, Monster Hunter, MadWorld and the Conduit. Not that they can stand up to Killzone, but because the quality of the graphics are great FOR WII, which means the developer put effort in the game (which will likely mean a good game).

Graphics like the afforementioned games are just the beginning. Again, not saying these will ever come close to a Killzone, but I'm sure we'll see awesome looking stuff on Wii.

I can only imagine what a real Wii Zelda will look like, since Twilight Princess looked great imo and was a GC game.

Not on VGChartz they havent, but i've been to IGN and GameFAQ's and i've heared comments such as "Wii's Graphics will overshadow the 360 pretty soon and PS3 soon to follow" so with that quote in mind there are those who are delusional enough to believe such obvious BS.

Wasn't pointing out anyone here, but i have heared it.

At anyrate im not sure about that Twilight because it was Multi-plat after all.

I know what you're getting at though, graphics can only get better obviously, but not to much to the point where in can even put a dent into the PS3 or X360.

I'd place a Bet though MH3 > All on wii. it looks beautiful on PSP thats why capcom did well on that franchise.

 

Are we on IGN? No. Are we on GameFAQs? No.

The fact that some lunatic on some forum said that Wii's graphics would be on par with PS3's is just as valid as using CrazzyMan's sales predictions to point out that all PS3 fans are completely retarded. Besides you're the one that brought that statement into this thread in the first place to make a non-existant point.

I'm sure MH3 will be among the best looking Wii games, so I agree with you there. That game also shows what a high budget can do on Wii.

 



killzone 2 has some kinda filter that makes the game look more life like. i don't know what it is ,,,maybe the post processing effects??



 

 

 

darthdevidem01 said:
@seraphic

ACTUALLY on Vg Chartz things like this HAVE been said

there was a huge EPIC thread a while ago claiming COD 4 grfx are capable on the wii (the OP was confident)

if people take crazzyman's predictions seriously & bash a game's sales upon those....I'm sure that thread can be counted as such discussions having been taken place on vg chartz

Why do you people care so much about graphics? If Resident Evil 5 and Killzone 2 are great games, it's not because of graphics. Also, the better game isn't necessarily the one with better graphics.



How many cups of darkness have I drank over the years? Even I don't know...

 

here is a gif,,,Darth you can add this to op if you like :

 



 

 

 

CGI-Quality said:
@ Dis

Well early reviewers already talk about Killzone 2. Framerate issues were only mentioned when loading a new area and that WAS NOT on the final build. The graphics were said to be the best there is and from the trailers, beta testers and early reviewers the game is stunning/best I've/they've seen.

 

I am aware of this and am not trying to take anything away from Killzone 2 or resident Evil 5... But generally speaking we are here building hype for games based on screenshots alone...whichis hillarious.  If anyone wants to post a fair comparison for any game they should make a thread containing 5 minutes of gameplay for both games. Pics and animated gifs dont count... anyone with any minor photoshop experience (including me) can brush up gifs and images to make one side look much better than other.