By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Girls or Video Games???

Slimebeast said:
Pristine20 said:

For the record, women also cheat more often than men...just so you know. The way it goes is this: 10 percent of guys f*** over 50% of girls (mainly the one's you won't go blind by looking at and pretty girls tend to f*** more just to reaffirm their prettiness making you wonder if they have anything else to bring to the table). Some of the other 90% of guys usually have a  steady girlfriend/wife who cheats on them every now and then (with a guy from the first 10%) while the others have nothing but the internet lol.

 

 

Pristine20 said:

For most men with girlfriends/wives, it was very hard to even get a "constant" lay in the first place so why would they risk being kicked back to the playing field? As for women (pretty ones, hell even some not-so-pretty ones), all it takes is to open their legs and any desperate male out there would jump in no questions asked. The only thing keeping women in "check" is the fear of being branded "sluts" by society. You're no fairytale. You may just be an exception but I don't know you so I can't even say for sure. It's obvious that you're trying to paint yourself a pretty picture. Me, I just call it like I see it.

If you don't believe me, go out and take a poll; ask 100 randomly selected guys the last time they had sex, I can bet $10,000 that you'll get an average of 4+ months. Do the same for girls and you'll get an average of maybe 3 weeks. Is this BS too?

 

 

It's a sensitive topic, but there's a lot of truth in this.

Those 10% of guys are the alpha males. For genetic reasons, chicks generally tend to wanna mate with the alpha males but have the second tier males take care of them and their kids. The alpha males are great sperm spreaders but too busy and unreliable as family providers.

Thank you for accepting the known observations unlike most people who posted on this thread

 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Pristine20 said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:

 

You've given enough evidence in this thread to earn the title (like: The only thing keeping women in "check" is the fear of being branded "sluts" by society)...  then taking things a step further to make things too damn personal telling her that "You'll be rid of the "fairytales" soon enough", "You're no fairlytale" and much like outlaw said that's basically putting yourself above her and deciding that she somehow believes she has a good relationship because of social conditioning and fairytales... could it possibly be that two people actually care about each other (love) and you don't have the right to say something so personal to someone especially someone you don't know nor know her situation...  So really get over yourself, if you got opinions that's fine, but if you're going to say something like that to someone keep it to yourself...

The last time I checked, that was not how pigs behaved. They don't even have anywhere close to the cognitive ability required to make the kind of arguments I've put forth. Quit defending "the girl". She can speak for herself. You've tried your best to condemn me and positioned your own opinions as "right" and in the same breath , tell me "get over yourself"...how amusing. Your opinion isn't doing me any favors either, you ought to have kept them to yourself

 

 

Uhm no you have no cooth about you, which is why I said to keep your opinions to yourself, you treat yourself as right and make comments that are too personal to someone who you don't know, it doesn't matter if they're female or male, not having respect for others is another pigish act which you only keep condemning yourself by replying to every post.  But the thing is because you must get the last word and feel above everyone posting you'll never listen to anyone else, see that there are other truths not just your own, as well as seeing that being so closed minded is ignorance, so is the life of the blind.

I argued my points with observations, known records and current statistics. No one else went that far. Instead of taking the time to understand the point I was putting forth, most of you resorted to knee jerk reactions..."oh, he's a pig", "he's an asshole"...please. You guys come back to me when you're mature enough and have learnt how to make your points instead of reacting like children.

 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

wfz said:
Pristine20 said:
epsilon72 said:
Pristine20 said:
epsilon72 said:
Pristine20, how do you explain the fact that some of us have parents, grandparents, extended family, etc. that have had meaningful relationships for decades?

I wouldn't call having a successful relationship an exception to the rule. All it takes is a bit of maturity and selflessness.

 

Just when I was hoping this thread would die...

Meaningful relationships =/= love. Check my previous posts for why I think some couples stick together. Also, the divorce rate have increased since parents and grandparents. This is what the data available says.

Really?  You have a really strange and different idea of what love is then...

 

Yeah, I'm not sure the concept exists. Loving someone = willing to die in their place (very concept of christianity). If only we could test this and see how many of those who are "in love" actually pass...

 

There are varying degrees and different forms of love. You can change the definition to suit whatever you want, to pretend like it can't exist, but that hardly changes the feelings many people have for others. I'm not arguing about anything else you said, but I really think it's a bit silly for you to deny that the feeling of love itself doesn't exist. You can argue back if you want, I find it hard to argue about love with logic and facts, but the truth is, love isn't something that is so easily defined. I'm not a psychologist, but I've felt really deep and caring feelings for people, and to me that's love.

I just want to put one thought in your head to think about though, most of "us" don't see love as one specific state, there are varying types of love for different relationships, and there are varying degrees of it, just like with any other emotion.

I will also say this, and it's been shown countless times in history, people WILL die to protect another person. Are you seriously denying this happens? I don't know your exact definition of love, but it's very possible that your idea of it doesn't exist. That however, doesn't mean that other people don't feel very attached and caring to others. Maybe you just need to redefine what love means to you.

Damn, arguing about what an emotion is and who feels it and when is pretty damn hard to do with logic and facts. I'd have just as hard a time arguing about what being "happy" is. It's really easy to twist and convolute these types of things to fit what you want it to.

One last thing though; lets say that I have this definiton in my head for what "happy" means. Now the definition I have set up for "happy" is beyond reach of what humans actually feel, but that doesn't mean that they aren't having those feelings of elation that they call "happiness", right? Or does everyone stop feeling "happy" because my definition of it is different from theirs?

This turned out a hella lot longer than I anticipated.

I applaud you for actually taking the time to respond to my post instead of having a childish reaction.

I think I get your point about love. I guess it's up to each person to define it for themselves. It's just that these days, many are unsure of their own definitions, judging by the "break up" rates but you're right. I shouldn't be the one to define it for others. I guess I just like to define everything and quantify as much as possible but I'll have to put this one aside.

Good points man. As for me, I'm still an observer and a social "tester" so I'll learn more with time. Cheers.

 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Pristine20 said:
wfz said:
Pristine20 said:
epsilon72 said:
Pristine20 said:

There are varying degrees and different forms of love. You can change the definition to suit whatever you want, to pretend like it can't exist, but that hardly changes the feelings many people have for others. I'm not arguing about anything else you said, but I really think it's a bit silly for you to deny that the feeling of love itself doesn't exist. You can argue back if you want, I find it hard to argue about love with logic and facts, but the truth is, love isn't something that is so easily defined. I'm not a psychologist, but I've felt really deep and caring feelings for people, and to me that's love.

I just want to put one thought in your head to think about though, most of "us" don't see love as one specific state, there are varying types of love for different relationships, and there are varying degrees of it, just like with any other emotion.

I will also say this, and it's been shown countless times in history, people WILL die to protect another person. Are you seriously denying this happens? I don't know your exact definition of love, but it's very possible that your idea of it doesn't exist. That however, doesn't mean that other people don't feel very attached and caring to others. Maybe you just need to redefine what love means to you.

Damn, arguing about what an emotion is and who feels it and when is pretty damn hard to do with logic and facts. I'd have just as hard a time arguing about what being "happy" is. It's really easy to twist and convolute these types of things to fit what you want it to.

One last thing though; lets say that I have this definiton in my head for what "happy" means. Now the definition I have set up for "happy" is beyond reach of what humans actually feel, but that doesn't mean that they aren't having those feelings of elation that they call "happiness", right? Or does everyone stop feeling "happy" because my definition of it is different from theirs?

This turned out a hella lot longer than I anticipated.

I applaud you for actually taking the time to respond to my post instead of having a childish reaction.

I think I get your point about love. I guess it's up to each person to define it for themselves. It's just that these days, many are unsure of their own definitions, judging by the "break up" rates but you're right. I shouldn't be the one to define it for others. I guess I just like to define everything and quantify as much as possible but I'll have to put this one aside.

Good points man. As for me, I'm still an observer and a social "tester" so I'll learn more with time. Cheers.

 

 

By break up rates, you mean with divorce right? I think that people tend to jump the gun when it comes to relationships, and oftentimes choose people who aren't actually well suited for them, just because their decisions are being overwhelmed by their emotions.

Like I said in my last post, there are different degrees and forms of love, and I think the biggest mistake people make is thinking that there is only one kind and almost no fluctuation in degree. They have strong feelings for another person, assume it's the same type of love that people with longlasting relationships have, and get burned later on. Not all love lasts, and not all love makes for great lasting relationships. It would be extremely helpful if the English language had more words for the different variations of love like most other languages do (from what I know of).

I do think that you need more than just love to make a relationship really blossom and work for life. Respect is definitely one of those things. Obviously sharing the same goals, liking similar daily activities, and having fun things to do that you both enjoy can really bring a lot to a relationship and help as well.

Humans are complicated... finding someone you want to be with for the rest of your life isn't supposed to be easy or straightforward. There is a lot more to it than being attracted to the other person and being infatuated with them.

Anyways, that's what I believe contributes to the high divorce rate, among other relationship problems.



wfz said:
Pristine20 said:
wfz said:
Pristine20 said:
epsilon72 said:
Pristine20 said:

There are varying degrees and different forms of love. You can change the definition to suit whatever you want, to pretend like it can't exist, but that hardly changes the feelings many people have for others. I'm not arguing about anything else you said, but I really think it's a bit silly for you to deny that the feeling of love itself doesn't exist. You can argue back if you want, I find it hard to argue about love with logic and facts, but the truth is, love isn't something that is so easily defined. I'm not a psychologist, but I've felt really deep and caring feelings for people, and to me that's love.

I just want to put one thought in your head to think about though, most of "us" don't see love as one specific state, there are varying types of love for different relationships, and there are varying degrees of it, just like with any other emotion.

I will also say this, and it's been shown countless times in history, people WILL die to protect another person. Are you seriously denying this happens? I don't know your exact definition of love, but it's very possible that your idea of it doesn't exist. That however, doesn't mean that other people don't feel very attached and caring to others. Maybe you just need to redefine what love means to you.

Damn, arguing about what an emotion is and who feels it and when is pretty damn hard to do with logic and facts. I'd have just as hard a time arguing about what being "happy" is. It's really easy to twist and convolute these types of things to fit what you want it to.

One last thing though; lets say that I have this definiton in my head for what "happy" means. Now the definition I have set up for "happy" is beyond reach of what humans actually feel, but that doesn't mean that they aren't having those feelings of elation that they call "happiness", right? Or does everyone stop feeling "happy" because my definition of it is different from theirs?

This turned out a hella lot longer than I anticipated.

I applaud you for actually taking the time to respond to my post instead of having a childish reaction.

I think I get your point about love. I guess it's up to each person to define it for themselves. It's just that these days, many are unsure of their own definitions, judging by the "break up" rates but you're right. I shouldn't be the one to define it for others. I guess I just like to define everything and quantify as much as possible but I'll have to put this one aside.

Good points man. As for me, I'm still an observer and a social "tester" so I'll learn more with time. Cheers.

 

 

By break up rates, you mean with divorce right? I think that people tend to jump the gun when it comes to relationships, and oftentimes choose people who aren't actually well suited for them, just because their decisions are being overwhelmed by their emotions.

Like I said in my last post, there are different degrees and forms of love, and I think the biggest mistake people make is thinking that there is only one kind and almost no fluctuation in degree. They have strong feelings for another person, assume it's the same type of love that people with longlasting relationships have, and get burned later on. Not all love lasts, and not all love makes for great lasting relationships. It would be extremely helpful if the English language had more words for the different variations of love like most other languages do (from what I know of).

I do think that you need more than just love to make a relationship really blossom and work for life. Respect is definitely one of those things. Obviously sharing the same goals, liking similar daily activities, and having fun things to do that you both enjoy can really bring a lot to a relationship and help as well.

Humans are complicated... finding someone you want to be with for the rest of your life isn't supposed to be easy or straightforward. There is a lot more to it than being attracted to the other person and being infatuated with them.

Anyways, that's what I believe contributes to the high divorce rate, among other relationship problems.

Yeah, it was divorce I was referring to by break up rate. Thats why people like me are extremely skeptic because it's not uncommon to have another show like "newlyweds" on TV only to have them break up in only 3 years. I agree that there are different forms of "love". Surely, a mother's "love" for her children would be different from the one between girlfriend and boyfriend. itwas only the one between girlfriend and boyfriend or husband and wife that I was attempting to tackle in my previous posts. These are usually the group that are referred to as "lovers".

from the social description of "love", I would think it also entails respect...no? Also, sometimes, they say variety is the spice of life. I've had girls who found me "interesting" because of how "different" I was. I'm not sure how that would apply to LTRs though but I don't think it's as simple as "interest in similar activities" and the like.

 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network

I have a wonderful Wife... so Girls!



SSBB FC: 5155 2671 4071 elgefe02: "VGChartz's Resident Raving Rabbit"   MKWii:5155-3729-0989

I wonder how skewed the votes are due to this being a public poll...

I mean, this is pretty obvious, but it's far from being socially acceptable for one to prefer games over girls, even on a gaming forum. If you wanted real results, it should've been anonymous, IMO.

... Yeah, was that too serious of a response? I am curious how different the results would've been, though.



"Girls or Video Games???"

Boys



"Librarse de tener que ir de jurado es facil. El truco está en decir que tienes prejuicios contra todas las razas". - Homer Simpson

girls



today i saw 3 nerds playing WOW during finals break lol