Its true that the PS3 culls the dull-minded from being able to eek out awesome performance from it, and rewards the intelligent engineer who can understand its curvy details.
Sadly... not a very good plan from a financial perspective, necessarily. Cool from a quality perspective, and that's assuming you own the market, and the smart engineers are interested in awesomeness (which has been known to yield good money), rather than easy money. Honestly, the PS2 was pretty similar to the PS3, in concept. I'm surprised at engineers who worked on the PS2 being so critical of the PS3.
If the PS3 ever surpasses, or even gets close to, the 360, it'll have been a very good decision. Publishers will be able to cull bad studios much easier, and the games will be much better for it. If Sony "wins", Gamers win.
The PS3's BD drive though... that was genious. I'm still surprised when people knock that choice. Sony will be rolling in money when(not if) BD takes over, and it'll make the losses from the PS3 development seem totally inconsequential. The PS3's status in the "console war" doesn't even matter any more, on that front.










