By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - which one is better?

Oh, OK. Over the lifetime of a PC, yes. As Slimebeast said, substantially more money will be spent on graphics in total.



Around the Network

my plan is this:

CPU: $200 - lifetime 3 - 4 years
1st GPU $50 - lifetime 1 - 1.5 years
2nd GPU $100-$150 - lifetime 1.5 - 2.5 years (will need to be a substantial upgrade, and i will do my best to find one on clearance/sale like i did with my first GPU)



Demon's Souls Official Thread  | Currently playing: Left 4 Dead 2, LittleBigPlanet 2, Magicka

Slimebeast said:

Yeah, what Soleron said.

Of course it also depends if you upgrade the CPU and GPU independent of each other, how much each component "should" cost:

Like, say that you plan to keep the CPU for 3 years but upgrade the GPU already after 1.5 years (which is my personal preference), then you don't necessairly have to put as much money on each GPU - but instead the combined money spent on the GPUs will still be a lot more than on the one CPU.

So, two version for a PC that you want to keep alive for 3 years and be able to run the latest games:

Version 1 (my old strategy):

CPU $150 - lifetime 3 years
GPU $400 - lifetime 3 years

or

version 2 (my current strategy):

CPU $150 - lifetime 3 years
1st GPU $200 - lifetime 1.5 years
2nd GPU $200 - lifetime 1.5 years

 

i'm going to use your current strategy then.. thank you ...

also, is this graphich card good? Geforce gtx295



Nintendo is a constant in life. Nintendo is the place where you can always go to have a great time, whether that is alone or together with friends. Nintendo made dozens of all time classics which are more than just amazing games. Nintendo is a gaming company. Nintendo raised our sorry asses better than a parent ever could. Nintendo is a religion. Nintendo is what drove gaming forward and what continues to drive gaming forward. Nintendo saved gaming in the '80s. Nintendo is saving gaming again right now.

Nintendo IS the industry. Nintendo IS gaming. - BY RolStoppable

Proud member of the Mega Mario Movement

Bolshack said:
Slimebeast said:

Yeah, what Soleron said.

Of course it also depends if you upgrade the CPU and GPU independent of each other, how much each component "should" cost:

Like, say that you plan to keep the CPU for 3 years but upgrade the GPU already after 1.5 years (which is my personal preference), then you don't necessairly have to put as much money on each GPU - but instead the combined money spent on the GPUs will still be a lot more than on the one CPU.

So, two version for a PC that you want to keep alive for 3 years and be able to run the latest games:

Version 1 (my old strategy):

CPU $150 - lifetime 3 years
GPU $400 - lifetime 3 years

or

version 2 (my current strategy):

CPU $150 - lifetime 3 years
1st GPU $200 - lifetime 1.5 years
2nd GPU $200 - lifetime 1.5 years

 

i'm going to use your current strategy then.. thank you ...

also, is this graphich card good? Geforce gtx295

Heh, of course. It's the best. It was just released.

The GTX 295 is about 10-15% faster than the 4870X2, but I think it cost at least $100 more. Therefore I would choose the 4870X2.

But with the "current strategy" (changing graphics card to a new one after 1.5 years or so) it could be smarter to start with buying a 4870 1GB (not the 512MB version) today for ~$200-225.

It depends on your daddys money lol.



 



Slimebeast said:
Bolshack said:
Slimebeast said:

Yeah, what Soleron said.

Of course it also depends if you upgrade the CPU and GPU independent of each other, how much each component "should" cost:

Like, say that you plan to keep the CPU for 3 years but upgrade the GPU already after 1.5 years (which is my personal preference), then you don't necessairly have to put as much money on each GPU - but instead the combined money spent on the GPUs will still be a lot more than on the one CPU.

So, two version for a PC that you want to keep alive for 3 years and be able to run the latest games:

Version 1 (my old strategy):

CPU $150 - lifetime 3 years
GPU $400 - lifetime 3 years

or

version 2 (my current strategy):

CPU $150 - lifetime 3 years
1st GPU $200 - lifetime 1.5 years
2nd GPU $200 - lifetime 1.5 years

 

i'm going to use your current strategy then.. thank you ...

also, is this graphich card good? Geforce gtx295

Heh, of course. It's the best. It was just released.

The GTX 295 is about 10-15% faster than the 4870X2, but I think it cost at least $100 more. Therefore I would choose the 4870X2.

But with the "current strategy" (changing graphics card to a new one after 1.5 years or so) it could be smarter to start with buying a 4870 1GB (not the 512MB version) today for ~$200-225.

It depends on your daddys money lol.


 

 

well then i'll stick with your strategy and change in 1,5 years to a new one.. thanks



Nintendo is a constant in life. Nintendo is the place where you can always go to have a great time, whether that is alone or together with friends. Nintendo made dozens of all time classics which are more than just amazing games. Nintendo is a gaming company. Nintendo raised our sorry asses better than a parent ever could. Nintendo is a religion. Nintendo is what drove gaming forward and what continues to drive gaming forward. Nintendo saved gaming in the '80s. Nintendo is saving gaming again right now.

Nintendo IS the industry. Nintendo IS gaming. - BY RolStoppable

Proud member of the Mega Mario Movement

Around the Network
Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:
WoW, it's saying the the Q6600 is 6.9% slower than the Phenom II X4 BE (and the the i7 is 7.1% faster). Read the page again.

Obviously.  That's what I've been saying this whole time.

Which is what I said to start with.

 

Senlis said:
Viper1 said:

There is almost 2 dozen out right now with another 2 dozen or so set to release this year.

 

Do you have a  link to a list of games that support quad core?

 

 

No, sorry.  That's all based on what I recall for what has been released and what is planned for 2009.

 



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Viper1 said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:
WoW, it's saying the the Q6600 is 6.9% slower than the Phenom II X4 BE (and the the i7 is 7.1% faster). Read the page again.

Obviously.  That's what I've been saying this whole time.

Which is what I said to start with.

It's always great to realize that you and the person you're arguing with are arguing the exact same thing.

 



Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:
WoW, it's saying the the Q6600 is 6.9% slower than the Phenom II X4 BE (and the the i7 is 7.1% faster). Read the page again.

Obviously.  That's what I've been saying this whole time.

Which is what I said to start with.

It's always great to realize that you and the person you're arguing with are arguing the exact same thing.

 

If only other facets of life could come to the same realization.  Congress, religion, your average couple....

 



The rEVOLution is not being televised