Actually no.. not really.. i mean you could say yes, but then again i could also tell you that this game:

And this game:

Are running on a modified version of the same engine.. the sage engine also known as the w3d engine.

WOW!! Super mario 64's graphics sucks compared to Sonic Unleashed graphics!!  I didn't know!!!

<end of exageration>

PD: what's the name of the video's song? 

I think this will prove that better graphics = less sales.

Such a shame that it just doesn't actually matter lol.

This reminds of the GT5 has better physics than Forza 2 thread. It just as pointless. Even though one is TPS and one is an FPS at least the Gears 2 vs. Resistance 2 comparisons were fair. The games came out at the same time. Both developers had down multiple titles on their respective hardware platforms. If game is released 2 years after another it should look better graphically.

btw all those saying that it's because it's two years later, well first off i'd like to mention that it's only 1 year later in the consoles life. A console harder to develop for.

Secondly, well coincidentially the footage used was from the 2007 trailer and screens meaning that the game in 2007 (one year after the ps3 came out) looked a lot better than the other game which came out the same year (2007) (two years after the xbox came out)

Now I completely know that it's different games etc. But I do think that killzone by now should have risen above all the bad name calling the game has gotten over time.