So the left side IS doctored then.. Does that mean the review build is worse than the CGI and hence the CGI had to be blurred?

The CGI looks way better but KIllzone 2 still looks great.

Don't know.. I just know a fanboy went crazy with Photoshop.... so he can say: T3h PS3 IS ALMIGHTY IT EVEN BEAT THE CGI!!!! With just 5% of the power if tha C3LL!!!! or something like that...

Oh com'on!

This is ridiculous. Using lifeless mini screenshots to try to trick people that the actual game is anywhere near the original CGI.

Final is much better, so Sony are not liars, good for PS3.

It would be a better comparison, if the pictures were a lot bigger.. Looking at the pics that size i like the review one, but I really like the cgi third and fourth shot. I hope they included that bridge in the final game.

The one thing that the CGI trailer had going for it was the animation and pictures can't show that. Gametrailers should do a side by side comparison.

Snore.

This feels like a repeat post eh?

I was kind of excited about Killzone 2, but its hyped like Halo 3 on here and I can't take it anymore.

That is not the review build. That was made after E3.

Regardless of how they look, you do still realise that they tried to pass a completely fake CGI as actual game footage? How can any responsible consumer not be pissed off about that?

Not saying that it's reasonable to still make angry threads about it, but all I've seen recently is angry threads defending Sony for lying to us, which is kinda silly even for the internet.